12.07.2015 Views

Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: - World Bank ...

Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: - World Bank ...

Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: - World Bank ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8<strong>Adjustment</strong> to <strong>Trade</strong> Policy <strong>in</strong>Develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Countries</strong>GORDON H HANSON1. INTRODUCTIONHow do develop<strong>in</strong>g countries adjust to changes <strong>in</strong> trade policy? Until the lastdecade, most trade economists would probably have used the Heckscher–Ohl<strong>in</strong>(HO) model, or some variant of it, to answer the question.1 The th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g was thattrade by develop<strong>in</strong>g countries was largely based on their comparative advantage<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries that were <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong> the use of unskilled labor, agricultural land,or supplies of natural resources. Models of <strong>in</strong>tra-<strong>in</strong>dustry trade were viewed asbest suited for analyz<strong>in</strong>g trade among developed countries. Developments <strong>in</strong> bothempirical and theoretical research suggest that factor proportions alone are <strong>in</strong>sufficientto understand how a develop<strong>in</strong>g economy will respond to trade liberalizationat home or abroad.On the empirical side, the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem, which uses HO logic topredict how changes <strong>in</strong> goods prices will affect factor prices, has not found muchempirical support (Goldberg and Pavcnik, 2007). Apply<strong>in</strong>g a simple HO modelimplies that trade liberalization will tend to reduce <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>gcountries, as factors move <strong>in</strong>to labor-<strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>dustries, caus<strong>in</strong>g the relativedemand for and <strong>in</strong>come of capital or skilled labor to decl<strong>in</strong>e. In fact, tradeliberalization is often accompanied by an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the relative demand for skilland a rise <strong>in</strong> wage <strong>in</strong>equality (Feenstra and Hanson, 2003). Another important development<strong>in</strong> the literature is recognition of significant differences between export<strong>in</strong>gand non-export<strong>in</strong>g firms, as well as between mult<strong>in</strong>ational and domesticenterprises. Relative to firms that sell solely on the domestic market, exporterstend to be larger, more skill-<strong>in</strong>tensive, more capital-<strong>in</strong>tensive, and more productive,and to pay higher wages (Bernard et al. 2007), a f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that holds <strong>in</strong> bothdeveloped and develop<strong>in</strong>g economies (Tybout, 2003). Mult<strong>in</strong>ational firms arelarger and more productive, still. When trade barriers fall, exporters expand at theexpense of smaller, less skill- and capital-<strong>in</strong>tensive domestic establishments. TheHO model is silent about why firms differ, ascrib<strong>in</strong>g them little role <strong>in</strong> adjustment.1 See, for <strong>in</strong>stance, Hanson’s (2004) discussion of literature on the analysis of trade reform <strong>in</strong> Mexico.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!