12.07.2015 Views

Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: - World Bank ...

Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: - World Bank ...

Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: - World Bank ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Duration of <strong>Trade</strong> Relationships 277We follow Rauch (1999) and classify commodities <strong>in</strong>to three categories: homogeneous,reference priced, and differentiated. Rauch classified products tradedon an organized exchange as homogeneous goods. Products not sold on exchangesbut whose benchmark prices exist were classified as reference priced;all other products were deemed differentiated.We beg<strong>in</strong> by exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nonparametric Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivalfunctions across product types. Estimates are graphed <strong>in</strong> Figure 17.3. As seen, mediansurvival times are extraord<strong>in</strong>arily short: five years for differentiated productsand two years for reference priced and homogeneous goods. Half of the traderelationships <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g reference priced and homogeneous goods fail dur<strong>in</strong>g thefirst two years. We report the nonparametric Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivalfunctions across product types <strong>in</strong> Table 17.3. As predicted by the model, differentiatedproducts dom<strong>in</strong>ate the other product types <strong>in</strong> their survival rates, at anystage of a relationship. In year one, 69 per cent of relationships <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g differentiatedgoods survive to year two, while only 55 and 59 per cent of relationships<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g homogeneous and reference priced goods do so. By year four,these rates decl<strong>in</strong>e to 52 per cent for differentiated and 33 per cent for homogeneousgoods. Between years four and 12 survival rates are stable decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by just7 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts for each product type. The differences <strong>in</strong> survival across producttypes are statistically significant. Similar results are found for the HS data(lower part of the table).Table 17.3: Kaplan-Meier Survival Rates 12Differentiated Products Reference Priced Products Homogeneous GoodsData Year 1 Year 4 Year 12 Year 1 Year 4 Year 12 Year 1 Year 4 Year 121972-1988 (7-digit TSUSA)Benchmark 0.69 0.52 0.45 0.59 0.38 0.31 0.55 0.33 0.25Obs>$100,000 0.92 0.86 0.83 0.80 0.66 0.60 0.69 0.49 0.411989-2001 (10-digit HS)Benchmark 0.66 0.48 0.44 0.65 0.46 0.40 0.62 0.40 0.35Obs>$100,000 0.92 0.85 0.83 0.86 0.75 0.71 0.76 0.59 0.55Note: The survival functions across the product types with<strong>in</strong> each dataset are statisticallysignificant at the 1% level us<strong>in</strong>g the logrank testThe model’s predictions regard<strong>in</strong>g start<strong>in</strong>g size are also supported. In order to<strong>in</strong>vestigate whether small, valued spells are at greatest risk we filtered out smalldollar-value observations; that is, we elim<strong>in</strong>ated spells with trade <strong>in</strong> the first yearbelow some m<strong>in</strong>imum level. We then estimate survival functions for each producttype after dropp<strong>in</strong>g the small-valued observations. In Table 17.3 we reportsurvival rates based on dropp<strong>in</strong>g all observations where the value of trade <strong>in</strong> thefirst year of the spell was less than $100,000.12 Extract from Table 2 <strong>in</strong> Besedeš and Prusa (2006b).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!