- Page 1 and 2:
Report SGC 118Adding gas from bioma
- Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS1 INTRODUCTION 32 IMPORTANC
- Page 5 and 6:
2 IMPORTANCE OF ADDING GAS FROM BIO
- Page 7 and 8:
Incentives by eco-labelingBy adding
- Page 9 and 10:
is mixed with coal in a combustor p
- Page 11 and 12:
Comparing efficiency data is a diff
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 1: Energy flow diagram and i
- Page 15 and 16:
The product revenues are the most u
- Page 17 and 18:
3.1.2 Survey of technologiesThis pa
- Page 19 and 20:
3.1.3 Table of biogas compositionsD
- Page 21 and 22:
Aspect Unit ValueManure M 3 /day 6B
- Page 23 and 24:
Technologies for syngas upgradingTh
- Page 25 and 26:
CompositionProcesscalorific value M
- Page 27 and 28:
4 PIPELINE QUALITY GAS FROM BIOGAS4
- Page 29 and 30:
Removal of hydrogen sulphide with m
- Page 31 and 32:
Parameter Unit Process Plant exampl
- Page 33 and 34:
Parameter Unit Process valueCapacit
- Page 35 and 36:
600.9500.840Wobbe index [MJ/m 3 n]R
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 4 illustrates reported inves
- Page 39 and 40:
4.3.4 Upgrading by absorption of ca
- Page 41 and 42:
Removal of carbon dioxide by water
- Page 43 and 44:
Selexol from the flash tank is depr
- Page 45 and 46:
poisonous and aggressive liquid wit
- Page 47 and 48:
Parameter Unit ProcessCapacity rang
- Page 49 and 50:
gas system is maintained by a contr
- Page 51 and 52:
In the gasification process the fir
- Page 53 and 54:
A catalytic process requires a feed
- Page 55 and 56:
In all countries gas in a distribut
- Page 57 and 58:
6 SUPPLYING GAS FROM BIOMASS TO THE
- Page 59 and 60:
In Europe only two kinds of natural
- Page 61 and 62:
Component or quality Unit Limit or
- Page 63 and 64:
The directive thus also provides po
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 13: Maximum range of permitt
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 16: Wobbe index for differen
- Page 69 and 70:
6.2.5 Discrepancies between standar
- Page 71 and 72: 6.2.7 Description of national or de
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 17:Arrangement of the contro
- Page 75 and 76: Measurement methodDetection tubes f
- Page 77 and 78: Descriptioncalculation of propertie
- Page 79 and 80: The possibility of adding off-spec
- Page 81 and 82: Europe among countries relying on e
- Page 83 and 84: 7.1.3 FinlandBiogas is mainly produ
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 18: Distribution of capacity
- Page 87 and 88: Calorific Availability Market price
- Page 89 and 90: Many landfills are equipped with ga
- Page 91 and 92: the type and volume of the respecti
- Page 93 and 94: 7.2.4 FranceThere are currently no
- Page 95 and 96: 7.2.7 SwedenBiogas as a fuel for ve
- Page 97 and 98: Policy on renewable energyThe gener
- Page 99 and 100: Danish energy policy is to contribu
- Page 101 and 102: Carbon dioxide taxApplication€/to
- Page 103 and 104: CHP FundThe CHP Fund is an incentiv
- Page 105 and 106: Taxation and incentivesFeed-in tari
- Page 107 and 108: Subsidies and fundingThere are seve
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 20:Impact of the energy tax
- Page 111 and 112: TargetsParallel with the target on
- Page 113 and 114: Sweden has no actual program dedica
- Page 115 and 116: Swedish energy taxesThe Swedish ene
- Page 117 and 118: 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSCo
- Page 119 and 120: 14 Upgrading Landfill Gas to Natura
- Page 121: 46 ISO 15971: “Natural gas - Meas
- Page 125 and 126: fixed bed gasification: BIONEERProc
- Page 127 and 128: Final cooling is accomplished by me
- Page 129 and 130: used for direct drying applications
- Page 131 and 132: fluidised bed gasification:EISENMAN
- Page 133 and 134: fluidised bed gasification:SELTECpr
- Page 135 and 136: The Battelle biomass gasification p
- Page 137 and 138: Primary heat exchangerThe primary h
- Page 139 and 140: active coal filter and cooled. The
- Page 141 and 142: • Kärnten (Austria)pyrolysis:Pro
- Page 143 and 144: Quality Value UnitComponents• Car