12.07.2015 Views

World Status, Exploitation and Trade - WIDECAST

World Status, Exploitation and Trade - WIDECAST

World Status, Exploitation and Trade - WIDECAST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAYMAN ISLANDSMany turtles were turned on the nesting beaches, but some were caught on thefeeding grounds to the south of Cuba. By 1711, the first signs of depletionof turtle stocks were recognised, <strong>and</strong> their extinction was inuninent by about1800. The population of experienced turtle fishermen who then inhabited theisl<strong>and</strong>s were forced to sail further afield for their quarry, <strong>and</strong> fishedchiefly around the Miskito Cays of Nicaragua by around 18A0. By 1900, theCayman turtle population was essentially extinct, but 12-17 schooners stillfished for turtles into the 1940s, catching about 2000-3000 turtles a year,mostly off Nicaragua. A turtle soup cannery opened in 1952, but closed thefollowing year as it failed to develop the predicted American market. In1956, the Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s exported a total of 4109 live C. mydas <strong>and</strong> 24 000pounds (10 909 kg) of calipee.Domestic trade See under RANCHING.International trade The Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s, as a dependent territory of theUK, have been included in the UK's ratification of CITES only since July1979. The major commercial shipments of C. mydas reported to have beenexported from the Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s are shown in Table 33. In almost everycase where an export was recorded, the corresponding import reported wassmaller. All of the C. mydas products recorded in the Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s AnnualReport are believed to have originated in the turtle farm. There is a verygood correlation between the quantities in Table 33 <strong>and</strong> the exports reportedby the farm in Table 38 for the years 1980-1983. A variety of othercountries have been reported as the destination of C. mydas productsexported from the Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> these are shown in the first half ofTable 34. Exports reached a peak in 1979 <strong>and</strong> 1980, in terms of volume, <strong>and</strong>were sent to the greatest variety of countries in 1980. This corresponds tothe period at which Cayman Turtle Farm was forced to slaughter <strong>and</strong> sell offmost of its stock (see below).Many products said to have originated in the Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s have beenrecorded in CITES Annual Reports as re-exports, <strong>and</strong> the countries to whichthese re-exports have been sent are shown in Table 34. The number ofdestination countries reached a peak in 1982 <strong>and</strong> 1983, <strong>and</strong> this probablyrepresents a time delay of two years between the primary export <strong>and</strong> there-export of manufactured products. The countries reported to havere-exported Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong> turtle products are shown in Table 35, the mainones being F.R. Germany, the UK, Italy <strong>and</strong> Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. Attention should bedrawn to the re-exports of large quantities of turtle skins from Mexicoreported on import into Hong Kong in 1981, 1982 <strong>and</strong> 1983. There is noindication that the Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s ever exported any turtle skins to Mexico<strong>and</strong> so it seems most probable that the skins were of wild origin, having hada false origin declared on the export documents.Japanese Customs statistics recorded few imports of bekko from the CaymanIsl<strong>and</strong>s prior to 1972, but imports since that date have been substantial(Table 36). Port l<strong>and</strong>ing statistics clearly indicate some l<strong>and</strong>ings ofE. imbricata in the Caymans (Table 32), but the quantities seem too low toaccount for the volume of imports to Japan. A possible explanation is thatthe exports were from other ports in the Caribbean but despatched by aCayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s company (Luxmoore <strong>and</strong> Canin, 1985). The imports of othertortoiseshell <strong>and</strong> turtle skins reported between 1980 <strong>and</strong> 1984 seemcomparable with the quantities of shell <strong>and</strong> skin reported as having beenexported by the Cayman Isl<strong>and</strong>s (Table 33).122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!