when they had recovered a magnetic mine in late November. 188 The Britishcontinued to update Kirk on the progress of their exploitation of the mine andprovided him details on the experimental countermeasure techniques theywere using to counter it. Clearly, British openness on this important matterwas beginning to have an impact on Kirk, as he had taken to referring toCAPT Morse as “his friend” in correspondence. 189 As shown above, it wasafter the New Year when Kirk became very forceful in his letters to Andersonconcerning the need to reciprocate to keep the valuable stream of informationcoming. While Kirk’s motivations may have been different from what Godfreyhoped they would be, as there are few expressions of sympathy for theBritish situation in Kirk’s correspondence, the Admiralty’s openness was havingthe desired effect on Kirk, who was vociferously advocating more cooperationbetween the two countries.For Kirk, the most significant breakthrough in the British attitude onexchanges came in March 1940. At that time, Godfrey told Kirk that the Britishwere in the process of forming a committee that would look into the matter ofexchanges and asked Kirk to come up with a list of U.S. information requirements.What Godfrey was alluding to was the British technical exchange missionthat would be led by one of England’s leading scientists, Dr. Henry Tizard. TheTizard mission, discussed in the next chapter, would have a profound and positiveeffect on the cooperation the U.S. would give the British in the matter of informa-188 Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Directorof Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, Enclosure (A) to letter dated 6 November 1939, Kirk Papers, 1-2; Alan GoodrichKirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Director of Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>,24 November 1939, Kirk Papers, 1-2; Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to RearAdmiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Director of Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 9 November 1939, Kirk Papers.Interestingly, the offer to provide the U.S. information on asdic originated from Churchill, whooffered the technology as part of his campaign to entice Roosevelt into a closer relationship with theUK. In the preceding reference (Kirk’s 9 November 1939 letter to Anderson) Kirk remarks thatGodfrey was caught off guard when Kirk raised the subject of exchange of information on asdic,apparently unaware that Churchill had made the offer, which had filtered down from Rooseveltthrough the U.S. Navy Department to Kirk. The details of the exchange of asdic technology wouldtake many months to conclude. For additional information see Zimmerman, 43-46; Alan GoodrichKirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Director of Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>,14 March 1940, Kirk Papers; James Leutze, “The Secret of the Churchill-Roosevelt Correspondence:September 1939-May 1940,” Journal of Contemporary History 10, no. 3 (July 1975),472, cited hereafter as Leutze, “Secret Churchill-Roosevelt Correspondence.”189 Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Directorof Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 6 December 1939, Kirk Papers, 1-2. Although Kirk never formed a close personalrelationship with Godfrey, he would fondly recall that he became good friends with ADMFraser, the Admiralty’s comptroller, and CAPT Miles, the Admiralty’s Director of Ordnance. Foradditional information see Kirk Reminiscences, 144-145.55
tion exchanges. Even more significant for Kirk, he was informed by Godfrey thatthe Admiralty would now allow personnel from the U.S. naval attaché office toinspect damaged British ships in dry-dock. Kirk was ecstatic at this opportunityand quickly dispatched his assistant naval attachés to Bath where they couldinspect ships damaged during a recent German attack on Scapa Flow. This privilegewas exclusive to the American attachés and Kirk was full of praise for theopenness that the British displayed in giving his personnel virtually unrestrictedaccess to the damaged vessels and answering any enquires his men had. 190Also in March 1940, Kirk met with the British comptroller, ADM Fraser, whorequested information on stern hangers and aircraft-dropped depth charges inexchange for access to the British ships. But ADM Fraser also told Kirk that itwas the “1st Sea Lord’s express wish—that we should not be perpetually ‘bargaining’,but if, on a ‘goodwill’ basis we could give them an occasionallead...they, for their part, were very glad to be helpful.” 191 Here was both thepromise and the implied threat to Kirk, that greater cooperation would reap evenmore information from the British, but continued reluctance on the part of theAmericans to honor any requests would make it difficult for the British to continuegiving the Americans such preferential treatment. British concerns in thisarea were understandable. Even though it appears the Americans were still passinginformation on Japanese naval movements to the British, as agreed to duringthe Ingersoll Mission in 1938, there is little evidence to indicate what else theU.S. was providing during this period. 192 Given Godfrey’s display of pique, notedabove, and Kirk’s repeated pleas to Anderson for more openness, we can deducethat the U.S. gave very little. 193190 Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Directorof Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 21 March 1940, Kirk Papers, 1-2; Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter toRear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Director of Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 26 March 1940, KirkPapers, 1-3; Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN,Director of Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 29 March 1940, Kirk Papers, 1; Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN,Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Director of Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 3 April 1940, KirkPapers, 1-2.191Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to Rear Admiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Directorof Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 21 March 1940, Kirk Papers, 3. This was one of the information requestsGodfrey was referring to when he castigated Kirk for the lack of information exchange reciprocityon the part of the Americans.192 Bath, 25; Leutze, “Secret Churchill-Roosevelt Correspondence,” 484.193 Even when requests made by the British were honored, mistakes were made. The U.S. Navydid eventually get around to providing the British information on airdropped depth charges, arequest first made in Fall 1939, but they did not do so until April 1940. To make matters worse, theNavy Department provided the information to the British Air Attaché, Group-Captain George Pirie,rather than to the British Naval Attaché, CAPT Curzon-Howe, this even though it was the RoyalNavy which had repeatedly made the request. Kirk advised Anderson to provide the information toCurzon-Howe. For additional information see Alan Goodrich Kirk, CAPT, USN, Letter to RearAdmiral Walter S. Anderson, USN, Director of Naval <strong>Intelligence</strong>, 2 May 1940, Kirk Papers, 1-2.56
- Page 1 and 2:
COURTING A RELUCTANT ALLYAn Evaluat
- Page 4:
The Joint Military Intelligence Col
- Page 8 and 9:
FOREWORDTo most Americans alive tod
- Page 10 and 11:
PROLOGUESince World War II, the Uni
- Page 12 and 13:
Chapter 1THE STATUS OF INTELLIGENCE
- Page 14 and 15:
action, a propaganda unit, or an ec
- Page 16 and 17: officers assisted by 20 civilian cl
- Page 18 and 19: ships in violation of treaty limits
- Page 20 and 21: assessments. By 1941, ONI was releg
- Page 22 and 23: might bear on their work.” 39 As
- Page 24 and 25: ility over time, its operational in
- Page 26 and 27: Chapter 2U.S.-UK RELATIONS, 1914-19
- Page 28 and 29: told by the Chief of Naval Operatio
- Page 30 and 31: ups of the early 20th century. 65 T
- Page 32 and 33: firmly believed that British polici
- Page 34: ecame one of the primary sources of
- Page 37 and 38: of shoring up their strategic weakn
- Page 39 and 40: mon framework for negotiation with
- Page 43 and 44: assuaged British concerns about the
- Page 45 and 46: In the area of intelligence exchang
- Page 47 and 48: clear to the Americans that if they
- Page 49 and 50: in his mind worked against closer c
- Page 51 and 52: praised the fighting spirit of the
- Page 53 and 54: through November of 1940 persuaded
- Page 55 and 56: and Great Britain. His principalcon
- Page 57 and 58: eceived by the British and from the
- Page 59 and 60: gear designed by the British. Altho
- Page 61 and 62: American Attitudes On Intelligence
- Page 63 and 64: information did have an impact on K
- Page 65: the affair. 183 This lack of resent
- Page 69 and 70: nation (BSC) mission, is now availa
- Page 71 and 72: good will and encouraged greater co
- Page 73 and 74: would merely show Donovan “the be
- Page 75 and 76: Lothian passed Hill’s proposal to
- Page 77 and 78: still a powerful influence. While Z
- Page 79 and 80: Since the Tizard Mission had only a
- Page 81 and 82: appropriating large increases to th
- Page 83 and 84: the French, a point which would not
- Page 85 and 86: equested that RADM Ghormley remain
- Page 87 and 88: when he [Pott] comes to O.N.I. he i
- Page 89 and 90: it was not official U.S. policy. St
- Page 91 and 92: efforts that had begun with the Sta
- Page 93 and 94: high-level ABC-1 staff talks which
- Page 95 and 96: to successfully interpret the instr
- Page 97 and 98: to little more than a nebulous stat
- Page 99 and 100: to offer.” 319 Others in the Brit
- Page 101 and 102: Operational Intelligence Cooperatio
- Page 103 and 104: Godfrey’s main concern was most l
- Page 105 and 106: possesses complementary capabilitie
- Page 107 and 108: 2. Be prepared to give something of
- Page 109 and 110: had in forming its own Joint Intell
- Page 112 and 113: GLOSSARYABC-1ALUSNALondonBGENBSCCAP
- Page 114 and 115: APPENDIX AA NOTE ON SOURCESArchival
- Page 116:
APPENDIX BMAJOR EVENTS IN U.S.-UK I
- Page 119 and 120:
________. Foreign Relations of the
- Page 121 and 122:
________. “The Secret of the Chur
- Page 123 and 124:
Zacharias, Ellis M., CAPT, USN. Sec
- Page 126 and 127:
INDEXAABC-1 Talks 41, 57, 74-75, 78
- Page 128 and 129:
IImagery Intelligence (IMINT) 12, 8
- Page 130 and 131:
Signals Intelligence(SIGINT) 2-3, 7
- Page 132:
PCN 53512ISBN 0-9656195-9-1