13.07.2015 Views

The Golden Bough (Third Edition, Vol. 7 of 12) - Mirrors

The Golden Bough (Third Edition, Vol. 7 of 12) - Mirrors

The Golden Bough (Third Edition, Vol. 7 of 12) - Mirrors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Golden</strong> <strong>Bough</strong> (<strong>Third</strong> <strong>Edition</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>)Latermisinterpretations<strong>of</strong> the custom <strong>of</strong>killing a god inanimal form.[023]indiscriminating rage.” 95<strong>The</strong> custom <strong>of</strong> killing a god in animal form, which we shallexamine more in detail further on, belongs to a very early stage<strong>of</strong> human culture, and is apt in later times to be misunderstood.<strong>The</strong> advance <strong>of</strong> thought tends to strip the old animal and plantgods <strong>of</strong> their bestial and vegetable husk, and to leave theirhuman attributes (which are always the kernel <strong>of</strong> the conception)as the final and sole residuum. In other words, animal andplant gods tend to become purely anthropomorphic. When theyhave become wholly or nearly so, the animals and plants whichwere at first the deities themselves, still retain a vague andill-understood connexion with the anthropomorphic gods whohave been developed out <strong>of</strong> them. <strong>The</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> the relationshipbetween the deity and the animal or plant having been forgotten,various stories are invented to explain it. <strong>The</strong>se explanations mayfollow one <strong>of</strong> two lines according as they are based on the habitualor on the exceptional treatment <strong>of</strong> the sacred animal or plant.<strong>The</strong> sacred animal was habitually spared, and only exceptionallyslain; and accordingly the myth might be devised to explaineither why it was spared or why it was killed. Devised for theformer purpose, the myth would tell <strong>of</strong> some service rendered tothe deity by the animal; devised for the latter purpose, the mythwould tell <strong>of</strong> some injury inflicted by the animal on the god.<strong>The</strong> reason given for sacrificing goats to Dionysus exemplifies amyth <strong>of</strong> the latter sort. <strong>The</strong>y were sacrificed to him, it was said,because they injured the vine. 96 Now the goat, as we have seen,95 A. Leared, Morocco and the Moors (London, 1876), pp. 267-269. CompareBudgett Meakin, <strong>The</strong> Moors (London, 1902), pp. 331 sq. <strong>The</strong> same order <strong>of</strong>fanatics also exists and holds similar orgies in Algeria, especially at the town <strong>of</strong>Tlemcen. See E. Doutté, Les Aïssâoua à Tlemcen (Châlons-sur-Marne, 1900),p. 13.96 Varro, Rerum rusticarum, i. 2. 19; Virgil, Georg. ii. 376-381, withthe comments <strong>of</strong> Servius on the passage and on Aen. iii. 118; Ovid, Fasti,i. 353 sqq.; id., Metamorph. xv. 114 sq.; Cornutus, <strong>The</strong>ologiae GraecaeCompendium, 30.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!