13.07.2015 Views

The Golden Bough (Third Edition, Vol. 7 of 12) - Mirrors

The Golden Bough (Third Edition, Vol. 7 of 12) - Mirrors

The Golden Bough (Third Edition, Vol. 7 of 12) - Mirrors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Golden</strong> <strong>Bough</strong> (<strong>Third</strong> <strong>Edition</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>)[068]Persephone; indeed in some cases it might be quite impossibleto distinguish the two if it were not for the inscriptions attachedto the figures. 240 <strong>The</strong> ancient sculptors, vase-painters, andengravers must have had some good reason for portraying thetwo goddesses in types which are almost indistinguishable fromeach other; and what better reason could they have had thanthe knowledge that the two persons <strong>of</strong> the godhead were one insubstance, that they stood merely for two different aspects <strong>of</strong> thesame simple natural phenomenon, the growth <strong>of</strong> the corn? Thusit is easy to understand why Demeter and Persephone may havebeen confused in ritual as well as in art, why in particular the part<strong>of</strong> the divine bride in a Sacred Marriage may sometimes havebeen assigned to the Mother and sometimes to the Daughter. Butall this, I fully admit, is a mere speculation, and I only put itforward as such. We possess far too little information as to aSacred Marriage in the Eleusinian Mysteries to be justified in240 See L. R. Farnell, <strong>The</strong> Cults <strong>of</strong> the Greek States, iii. (Oxford, 1907), p. 259,“It was long before the mother could be distinguished from the daughter by anyorganic difference <strong>of</strong> form or by any expressive trait <strong>of</strong> countenance. On themore ancient vases and terracottas they appear rather as twin-sisters, almost asif the inarticulate artist were aware <strong>of</strong> their original identity <strong>of</strong> substance. Andeven among the monuments <strong>of</strong> the transitional period it is difficult to find anyrepresentation <strong>of</strong> the goddesses in characters at once clear and impressive. Wemiss this even in the beautiful vase <strong>of</strong> Hieron in the British Museum, wherethe divine pair are seen with Triptolemos: the style is delicate and stately, andthere is a certain impression <strong>of</strong> inner tranquil life in the group, but without theaid <strong>of</strong> the inscriptions the mother would not be known from the daughter”; id.,vol. iii. 274, “But it would be wrong to give the impression that the numismaticartists <strong>of</strong> this period were always careful to distinguish—in such a manneras the above works indicate—between mother and daughter. <strong>The</strong> old idea <strong>of</strong>their unity <strong>of</strong> substance still seemed to linger as an art-tradition: the very typewe have just been examining appears on a fourth-century coin <strong>of</strong> Hermione,and must have been used here to designate Demeter Chthonia who was therethe only form that the corn-goddess assumed. And even at Metapontum,where coin-engraving was long a great art, a youthful head crowned with corn,which in its own right and on account <strong>of</strong> its resemblance to the masterpiece<strong>of</strong> Euainetos could claim the name <strong>of</strong> Kore [Persephone], is actually inscribed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!