13.07.2015 Views

«Symposion» and «Philanthropia» in Plutarch - Bad Request ...

«Symposion» and «Philanthropia» in Plutarch - Bad Request ...

«Symposion» and «Philanthropia» in Plutarch - Bad Request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Plato’s Symposium <strong>and</strong> <strong>Plutarch</strong>’s AlcibiadesAlcibiades’ words at Smp. 215e, “For my heart leaps, <strong>and</strong> tears pour out underthe <strong>in</strong>fluence of his words” (ἥ τε καρδία πηδᾷ καὶ δάκρυα ἐκχεῖται ὑπὸ τῶνλόγων τῶν τούτου) 22 , but <strong>Plutarch</strong> has added στρεφόντων (“twist<strong>in</strong>g”), whichga<strong>in</strong>s particular force because of the wrestl<strong>in</strong>g metaphor which follows <strong>in</strong> 6.2(cf. also πιεζοῦντος <strong>in</strong> 4.3); it also looks back to the earlier story of Alcibiades’wrestl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2.2-3: though <strong>in</strong> real wrestl<strong>in</strong>g Alcibiades could beat his opponentthrough a trick, emotionally <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectually Socrates outwrestled him 23 .<strong>Plutarch</strong> has also added from the Republic the notion of Alcibiades’ εὐφυΐα,prom<strong>in</strong>ent already <strong>in</strong> ch. 4 (cf. Smp. 218a, μὴ ἀφυοῦς). Here, as <strong>in</strong> ch. 4, itprovides an explanation for why Socrates took such an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> Alcibiades;it also expla<strong>in</strong>s why Socrates’ words had such an effect on Alcibiades: it was tohis credit that he allowed Socrates to master him.In ch. 4, when discuss<strong>in</strong>g the tough treatment Alcibiades received atSocrates’ h<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>Plutarch</strong> had quoted a l<strong>in</strong>e of a lost play, probably by thetragedian Phrynichos, “a cock, he crouched down like a slave, lower<strong>in</strong>g hisw<strong>in</strong>g” 24 . The image is of a defeated bird <strong>in</strong> a cock-fight, which seems to havebeen called a δοῦλος (4.4) 25 . Now <strong>Plutarch</strong> presses the metaphor of slaveryfurther: “There were times”, he cont<strong>in</strong>ues (6.1), “when Alcibiades surrenderedhimself to his flatterers too, who offered many pleasures, <strong>and</strong> he would slipaway from Socrates <strong>and</strong> like a runaway slave (δραπετεύων) would be quitesimply hunted down, only towards Socrates hav<strong>in</strong>g the experience of shame<strong>and</strong> fear” (πρὸς μόνον ἐκεῖνον ἔχων τὸ αἰδεῖσθαι καὶ τὸ φοβεῖσθαι) (6.1). Thenotion of Alcibiades as a runaway slave draws on his speech <strong>in</strong> the Symposium,where he describes himself as “<strong>in</strong> a state of slavery” to Socrates (215e: ὡςἀνδραποδωδῶς διακειμένου), <strong>and</strong> as try<strong>in</strong>g to avoid listen<strong>in</strong>g to him butto flee <strong>in</strong>stead. When he is <strong>in</strong> Socrates’ presence, he admits his deficiencies<strong>and</strong> feels ashamed: “I experienced only with this man, what no-one wouldhave thought me capable of – shame before anyone. Only before him amI ashamed” 26 . But when he leaves Socrates’ presence he is “defeated by thehonour which comes from the multitude”. “So I run away from him <strong>and</strong> flee(δραπετεύω οὖν αὐτὸν καὶ φεύγω), <strong>and</strong> when I see him I am ashamed as Ith<strong>in</strong>k of my former admissions” (216b-c) 27 . But whereas Plato left it vague22Noted by D. A. Russell, 1966, p. 40 (= repr. 1995, 196). <strong>Plutarch</strong> also paraphrases thispassage <strong>in</strong> Prof. <strong>in</strong> Virt. 84d, Quomodo adulat. 69f, <strong>and</strong> Cat. Ma. 7.123Στρέφω can be used of <strong>in</strong>flict<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> general (e.g. Plato, Rep. 330e), but also of twist<strong>in</strong>gan adversary <strong>in</strong> wrestl<strong>in</strong>g: e.g. Pollux 3.155; M. B. Poliakoff, 1982, pp. 140-1. ἀπωλίσθανε <strong>in</strong>6.1 (“used to slip away”) may suggest slipp<strong>in</strong>g out of an opponent’s grip <strong>in</strong> wrestl<strong>in</strong>g. The wordis frequent <strong>in</strong> <strong>Plutarch</strong> though otherwise always used literally, but cf. Epict. 3.25.1 (ἀνάλαβεκἀκεῖνα ὧν ἀπώλισθες).24Or, “he crouched down like a slave-cock . . .”: ἔπτηξ’ ἀλέκτωρ δοῦλος ὣς κλίνας πτερόν.25Cf. Ar., Birds 71-72, ὄρνις ἔγωγε δοῦλος, with N. Dunbar, 1995, p. 158. Its applicationto the young Alcibiades suggests both his strutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> preen<strong>in</strong>g (cf. 1.8; 16.1) <strong>and</strong> the totalityof his humiliation at Socrates’ h<strong>and</strong>s. For cocks seen as symbolis<strong>in</strong>g strutt<strong>in</strong>g confidence, cf.Dem. 54.9.26πέπονθα δὲ πρὸς τοῦτον μόνον ἀνθρώπων, ὃ οὐκ ἄν τις οἴοιτο ἐν ἐμοὶ ἐνεῖναι, τὸαἰσχύνεσθαι ὁντινοῦν· ἐγὼ δὲ τοῦτον μόνον αἰσχύνομαι.27D. A. Russell, 1966, p. 40 (= repr. 1995, p. 196) notes the parallels with 216b.43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!