19.11.2016 Views

ANNUAL REPORT

2016%20Annual%20Report%20to%20Congress

2016%20Annual%20Report%20to%20Congress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with USCC<br />

194<br />

(UNCLOS); * (2) certain land features in the South China Sea are<br />

rocks, islands, or low-tide elevations; † and (3) China has interfered<br />

with the Philippines’ right to exploit resources within the latter’s<br />

claimed waters. 1<br />

In a blow to the credibility of China’s claims, the tribunal ruled<br />

overwhelmingly in the Philippines’ favor. The most notable findings<br />

of the 479-page ruling included:<br />

• China’s claims to historic rights and resources within the ninedash<br />

line (see Figure 1) have no legal basis. 2<br />

• None of China’s claimed land features in the Spratly Islands<br />

are islands (and as such, none of China’s claimed features can<br />

generate more than 12 nautical miles [nm] of surrounding<br />

maritime territory). 3<br />

• China violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights by conducting<br />

the following activities in the Philippines’ exclusive economic<br />

zone: interfering with Philippine oil exploration activities, prohibiting<br />

Filipino fishermen from operating, failing to stop Chinese<br />

fishermen from operating, and building artificial islands. 4<br />

• China violated its marine environmental protection obligations<br />

under UNCLOS by causing ‘‘severe harm to the coral reef environment’’<br />

with its land reclamation activities and by not preventing<br />

the harvesting of endangered species by Chinese fishermen.<br />

5<br />

While many countries in the region and around the world responded<br />

to the ruling with statements of support for international<br />

law, 6 China’s initial response was to reject and attempt to discredit<br />

the ruling. 7 Also, in early August, China’s Supreme People’s Court<br />

announced that foreign fishermen who illegally fish in China’s ‘‘jurisdictional<br />

waters’’ could be imprisoned for up to one year. 8 The<br />

actions China could take in the longer term to consolidate its territorial<br />

claims and register its displeasure with the ruling include,<br />

among other things, one or more of the following: increasing its<br />

presence and activities in disputed waters; adding arms or defenses<br />

to land features it occupies; conducting land reclamation on Scarborough<br />

Reef—a coral reef atoll claimed by China, the Philippines,<br />

and Taiwan—over which China effectively secured control in 2012;<br />

and declaring an air defense identification zone (ADIZ) ‡ over part<br />

of the South China Sea.<br />

* China is a party to UNCLOS.<br />

† The distinction, as defined by UNCLOS, between an island, rock, and low-tide elevation is<br />

important because each type of feature generates a different maritime entitlement. Islands,<br />

which must be above water at high tide and be capable of sustaining human habitation or economic<br />

activity of their own, can generate exclusive economic zones. (An exclusive economic zone<br />

is a 200-nautical-mile zone extending from a country’s coastline, within which that country can<br />

exercise exclusive sovereign rights to explore for and exploit natural resources, but over which<br />

it does not have full sovereignty.) Rocks, which are defined as being above water at high tide<br />

but unable to sustain human habitation or economic activity, only generate a 12-nautical-mile<br />

territorial sea. Low-tide elevations are land features that are submerged at high tide. Unless<br />

they are located within the territorial sea of another island or mainland coastline, they do not<br />

generate any maritime entitlements. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, ‘‘Part 8: Regime<br />

of Islands’’; UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, ‘‘Part 2: Territorial Sea and Contiguous<br />

Zone’’; and UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, ‘‘Part 5: Exclusive Economic Zone.’’<br />

‡ An ADIZ is a publicly declared area, established in international airspace adjacent to a<br />

state’s national airspace, in which the state requires that civil aircraft provide aircraft identifiers<br />

and location. Its purpose is to allow a state the time and space to identify the nature of<br />

approaching aircraft before those aircraft enter national airspace in order to prepare defensive<br />

VerDate Sep 11 2014 12:16 Nov 02, 2016 Jkt 020587 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 G:\GSDD\USCC\2016\FINAL\06_C1_C2_M.XXX 06_C1_C2_M

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!