19.11.2016 Views

ANNUAL REPORT

2016%20Annual%20Report%20to%20Congress

2016%20Annual%20Report%20to%20Congress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50<br />

Figure 8: U.S. FDI Stock in China, 2008–2015<br />

(cumulative, historical-cost basis)<br />

US$ billions<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.<br />

This reflects broader inbound FDI trends in China: FDI flows<br />

into China have slowed in recent years due to rising costs, concerns<br />

over the foreign investment climate, expectations for further RMB<br />

weakness, and competition from Southeast Asian countries. 108 Official<br />

statistics from China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) show<br />

nonfinancial FDI in China reaching $117 billion (RMB 781.4 billion)<br />

in 2015, a modest increase of 6.4 percent from 2014. 109 In the first<br />

half of 2016, nonfinancial FDI rose 5.1 percent year-on-year to $69.4<br />

billion; the service sector accounted for 70.4 percent of total FDI<br />

during the period, reaching $48.9 billion. 110<br />

Challenges for U.S. Companies in China<br />

Market Access Restrictions<br />

China’s restrictive investment regime has earned it the second-worst<br />

rating on the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation<br />

and Development’s (OECD) FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index *<br />

every year since the index’s inception in 2010. 111 To protect domestic<br />

industries, particularly those deemed strategic, China continues<br />

to limit foreign investment in many sectors where the United States<br />

maintains a competitive advantage, such as research and development<br />

(R&D)-intensive and value-added sectors.† Despite high-level<br />

* The OECD FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index includes both OECD economies and non-<br />

OECD member economies and is based on four main indicators: “equity restrictions, screening<br />

and approval requirements, restrictions on foreign key personnel, and other operational restrictions<br />

(such as limits on purchase of land or on repatriation of profits and capital). The discriminatory<br />

nature of measures is the central criterion to decide whether a measure should be scored.”<br />

Blanka Kalinova, Angel Palerm, and Stephen Thomsen, “OECD’s FDI Restrictiveness Index: 2010<br />

Update,” OECD Working Papers on International Investment 03 (2010): 6.<br />

† For more on China’s foreign investment restrictions, see U.S.-China Economic Security Review<br />

Commission, Chapter 1, Section 2, “Foreign Investment Climate in China,” in 2015 Annual Report<br />

to Congress, November 2015.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!