Study on feasibility of SATCOM for railway communication
SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216
SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Final Report<br />
CRT-NONT-3<br />
CRT-NONT-4<br />
CRT-NONT-5<br />
CRT-NONT-6<br />
Partially<br />
Compliant<br />
Not Compliant<br />
Not Applicable<br />
Unknown<br />
Fully Compliant<br />
Partially<br />
Compliant<br />
Not Compliant<br />
Not Applicable<br />
Unknown<br />
Fully Compliant<br />
Partially<br />
Compliant<br />
Not Compliant<br />
Not Applicable<br />
Unknown<br />
Fully Compliant<br />
Partially<br />
Compliant<br />
Not Compliant<br />
Not Applicable<br />
Unknown<br />
Fully Compliant<br />
Partially<br />
Compliant<br />
Not Compliant<br />
Not Applicable<br />
The technology maintenance is acceptable c<strong>on</strong>sidering the current<br />
market and pool <strong>of</strong> candidates<br />
The technology involves unacceptably high investments, down time<br />
and/or complexity to maintain the system<br />
This criteria has not been assessed<br />
The results from the assessment are uncertain<br />
The technology is understood by all acceptable estimates to be<br />
deployable within 10 years‘ time starting <strong>on</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> publicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
this study<br />
The technology is likely to be deployable within 10 years‘ time with<br />
small ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />
The technology is by all estimates impossible to be deployed within<br />
10 years‘ times<br />
This criteria has not been assessed<br />
The results from the assessment are uncertain<br />
After the cost-benefit analysis, the full lifecycle cost associated with<br />
this technology is lower than GSM-R<br />
After the cost-benefit analysis, the full lifecycle cost associated with<br />
this technology is likely to be lower, but within a close margin from<br />
GSM-R<br />
After the cost-benefit analysis, the cost associated with this<br />
technology appears to be clearly higher than GSM-R<br />
This criteria has not been assessed<br />
The results from the assessment are uncertain<br />
The IRR <strong>for</strong> the full lifecycle cost compared to GSM-R is higher than<br />
4%<br />
The IRR <strong>for</strong> the full lifecycle cost compared to GSM-R is higher than<br />
3%<br />
The IRR <strong>for</strong> the full lifecycle cost compared to GSM-R is lower than<br />
3%<br />
This criteria has not been assessed<br />
The results from the assessment are uncertain<br />
The technology could meet <strong>railway</strong> certificati<strong>on</strong> standards with<br />
minimal or no modificati<strong>on</strong><br />
The technology could likely meet <strong>railway</strong> certificati<strong>on</strong> standards with<br />
some modificati<strong>on</strong><br />
The technology could likely not meet <strong>railway</strong> certificati<strong>on</strong> standards<br />
This criteria has not been assessed<br />
Doc.Nº: SRAIL-FNR-010-IND<br />
Edit./Rev.: 1/1<br />
Date: 16/02/2017<br />
Page 163 <strong>of</strong> 285
Change language