14.03.2017 Views

Study on feasibility of SATCOM for railway communication

SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216

SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Final Report<br />

GEO / Ku-band<br />

Criteri<strong>on</strong> ID Criteri<strong>on</strong> Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Justificati<strong>on</strong><br />

CRT-TECH-4a<br />

Transfer delay <strong>for</strong> the proposed satellite system shall be Low.<br />

Note: It refers to the end-to-end (<strong>on</strong>e-way) delay due to the<br />

satellite channel. There<strong>for</strong>e, it shall be measured from satellite<br />

transmitter to satellite receiver.<br />

4a: Single-hop required<br />

C (Low)<br />

A GEO satcom soluti<strong>on</strong> minimum transfer delay is limited by the distance between<br />

terminal and satellite, which is around 250 ms.<br />

Since a GEO / Ku-band satcom system based <strong>on</strong> DVB-S2/DVB-RCS2+M<br />

communicati<strong>on</strong> standards is broadband, delay related with the data transmissi<strong>on</strong><br />

is negligible in fr<strong>on</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the 250 ms due to the GEO satellite.<br />

CRT-TECH-4b 4b: Double-hop required NC<br />

The double hop transfer delay <strong>for</strong> a GEO soluti<strong>on</strong> is not compliant with <strong>railway</strong><br />

requirements with independence <strong>of</strong> the frequency band used, since <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidering the propagati<strong>on</strong> delay to a GEO satellite is around 500 ms.<br />

CRT-TECH-5<br />

Delay jitter <strong>of</strong> the proposed satcom system shall be Low.<br />

Note: Since this criteri<strong>on</strong> refers to the <strong>on</strong>e-way satellite<br />

channel jitter, it shall be measured from satellite transmitter to<br />

satellite receiver.<br />

C (Low)<br />

Just like previous "opened" GEO satcom soluti<strong>on</strong>s, this criteri<strong>on</strong> is marked as a "C<br />

(Low)", since there exist mechanisms to compensate the delay time variati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

between packets at IP level, but the lower the orbit the lower the delay jitter.<br />

CRT-TECH-6<br />

Network registrati<strong>on</strong> delay <strong>for</strong> the proposed satcom system<br />

shall be Normal (with similar values <strong>of</strong> current GSM-R system).<br />

C<br />

Assuming a good network dimensi<strong>on</strong>ing according to the estimated throughput,<br />

the registrati<strong>on</strong> process <strong>of</strong> the GEO/Ku-band system based <strong>on</strong> DVB-S2 / DVB-<br />

RCS2 communicati<strong>on</strong> standards can take a "normal" time similar to current GSM-<br />

R per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

CRT-TECH-7<br />

The call establishment delay <strong>for</strong> the proposed satcom system<br />

shall be Low.<br />

Note: as a first reference, GSM-R establishment delays can be<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered.<br />

C<br />

In the same way that previous "opened" satcom systems, the call establishment<br />

process <strong>of</strong> the GEO/Ku-band system based <strong>on</strong> IP and DAMA access scheme can<br />

be designed in order to assure a low delay similar to the <strong>on</strong>e per<strong>for</strong>med by the<br />

current GSM-R system. It requires the correct dimensi<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the network<br />

resources according to throughput requirements.<br />

Doc.Nº: SRAIL-FNR-010-IND<br />

Edit./Rev.: 1/1<br />

Date: 16/02/2017<br />

Page 272 <strong>of</strong> 285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!