Study on feasibility of SATCOM for railway communication
SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216
SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Final Report<br />
GEO / Ku-band<br />
Criteri<strong>on</strong> ID Criteri<strong>on</strong> Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Justificati<strong>on</strong><br />
CRT-TECH-4a<br />
Transfer delay <strong>for</strong> the proposed satellite system shall be Low.<br />
Note: It refers to the end-to-end (<strong>on</strong>e-way) delay due to the<br />
satellite channel. There<strong>for</strong>e, it shall be measured from satellite<br />
transmitter to satellite receiver.<br />
4a: Single-hop required<br />
C (Low)<br />
A GEO satcom soluti<strong>on</strong> minimum transfer delay is limited by the distance between<br />
terminal and satellite, which is around 250 ms.<br />
Since a GEO / Ku-band satcom system based <strong>on</strong> DVB-S2/DVB-RCS2+M<br />
communicati<strong>on</strong> standards is broadband, delay related with the data transmissi<strong>on</strong><br />
is negligible in fr<strong>on</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the 250 ms due to the GEO satellite.<br />
CRT-TECH-4b 4b: Double-hop required NC<br />
The double hop transfer delay <strong>for</strong> a GEO soluti<strong>on</strong> is not compliant with <strong>railway</strong><br />
requirements with independence <strong>of</strong> the frequency band used, since <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidering the propagati<strong>on</strong> delay to a GEO satellite is around 500 ms.<br />
CRT-TECH-5<br />
Delay jitter <strong>of</strong> the proposed satcom system shall be Low.<br />
Note: Since this criteri<strong>on</strong> refers to the <strong>on</strong>e-way satellite<br />
channel jitter, it shall be measured from satellite transmitter to<br />
satellite receiver.<br />
C (Low)<br />
Just like previous "opened" GEO satcom soluti<strong>on</strong>s, this criteri<strong>on</strong> is marked as a "C<br />
(Low)", since there exist mechanisms to compensate the delay time variati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
between packets at IP level, but the lower the orbit the lower the delay jitter.<br />
CRT-TECH-6<br />
Network registrati<strong>on</strong> delay <strong>for</strong> the proposed satcom system<br />
shall be Normal (with similar values <strong>of</strong> current GSM-R system).<br />
C<br />
Assuming a good network dimensi<strong>on</strong>ing according to the estimated throughput,<br />
the registrati<strong>on</strong> process <strong>of</strong> the GEO/Ku-band system based <strong>on</strong> DVB-S2 / DVB-<br />
RCS2 communicati<strong>on</strong> standards can take a "normal" time similar to current GSM-<br />
R per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
CRT-TECH-7<br />
The call establishment delay <strong>for</strong> the proposed satcom system<br />
shall be Low.<br />
Note: as a first reference, GSM-R establishment delays can be<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered.<br />
C<br />
In the same way that previous "opened" satcom systems, the call establishment<br />
process <strong>of</strong> the GEO/Ku-band system based <strong>on</strong> IP and DAMA access scheme can<br />
be designed in order to assure a low delay similar to the <strong>on</strong>e per<strong>for</strong>med by the<br />
current GSM-R system. It requires the correct dimensi<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the network<br />
resources according to throughput requirements.<br />
Doc.Nº: SRAIL-FNR-010-IND<br />
Edit./Rev.: 1/1<br />
Date: 16/02/2017<br />
Page 272 <strong>of</strong> 285