14.03.2017 Views

Study on feasibility of SATCOM for railway communication

SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216

SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Final Report<br />

In order to successfully deploy a <strong>SATCOM</strong> soluti<strong>on</strong> as part <strong>of</strong> the multi-technology <strong>railway</strong><br />

architecture, several aspects have to be c<strong>on</strong>sidered, such as the regulatory framework, <strong>railway</strong><br />

certificati<strong>on</strong>s, the use <strong>of</strong> communicati<strong>on</strong> standards, geographical c<strong>on</strong>straints and some other technical<br />

implicati<strong>on</strong>s because <strong>of</strong> introducing <strong>SATCOM</strong> technologies into the <strong>railway</strong> field and in a multitechnology<br />

architecture. It is even <strong>of</strong> relevance to c<strong>on</strong>sider the <strong>SATCOM</strong> market interest to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

products and services <strong>for</strong> the <strong>railway</strong> domain, since without this interest the previous aspects can<br />

hardly be achieved.<br />

Finally, and from the ec<strong>on</strong>omic point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> satellite soluti<strong>on</strong>s compared with terrestrial <strong>on</strong>es, it is<br />

worth menti<strong>on</strong>ing that two main scenarios can be analysed: Brownfield (when c<strong>on</strong>sidering terrestrial<br />

soluti<strong>on</strong>s deployed re-using current GSM-R infrastructure) and Greenfield (when deploying future<br />

terrestrial soluti<strong>on</strong>s from scratch). In this sense, <strong>SATCOM</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic <strong>feasibility</strong> raises when deploying<br />

a <strong>railway</strong> communicati<strong>on</strong> system in a new line (Greenfield), since it is much cheaper (in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

CAPEX) and faster to deploy than terrestrial soluti<strong>on</strong>s. This is because <strong>of</strong> ground infrastructure is not<br />

required in <strong>SATCOM</strong> soluti<strong>on</strong>s (except <strong>for</strong> those areas to be covered by alternatives terrestrial<br />

soluti<strong>on</strong>s due to the lack <strong>of</strong> satellite coverage).<br />

Doc.Nº: SRAIL-FNR-010-IND<br />

Edit./Rev.: 1/1<br />

Date: 16/02/2017<br />

Page 19 <strong>of</strong> 285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!