- Page 1 and 2: Study on feasibili
- Page 3 and 4: Final Report RECORD OF EDITIONS AND
- Page 5 and 6: Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Chap
- Page 7 and 8: Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Chap
- Page 9 and 10: Final Report FIGURES INDEX Descript
- Page 11 and 12: Final Report Figure 64: Certificati
- Page 13 and 14: Final Report TABLES INDEX Descripti
- Page 15: Final Report ACRONYMS ACM ATM BGAN
- Page 19 and 20: Final Report In order to successful
- Page 21 and 22: Final Report Business Communication
- Page 23 and 24: Final Report Figure 2: Railway comm
- Page 25 and 26: Final Report CRT-NONT-2 CRT-NONT-3
- Page 27 and 28: Final Report 7 8 9 10 GEO / C-band
- Page 29 and 30: Final Report 1.5.1 Cost Benefit Ana
- Page 31 and 32: Final Report or GEO/C-band, as well
- Page 33 and 34: Final Report - Some of the other sy
- Page 35 and 36: Final Report 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 DO
- Page 37 and 38: Final Report 2.4 STUDY METHODOLOGY
- Page 39 and 40: Final Report 2.5 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE
- Page 41 and 42: Final Report RD-23 D020 ANTARES Com
- Page 43 and 44: Final Report Latency Bandwidth 25 2
- Page 45 and 46: Final Report Two-way communication
- Page 47 and 48: Final Report Table 8: Satellite con
- Page 49 and 50: Final Report Star topology is the m
- Page 51 and 52: Final Report Satcom System (Railway
- Page 53 and 54: Final Report Parameter Definition Q
- Page 55 and 56: Final Report Parameter Types of ter
- Page 57 and 58: Final Report Services & Application
- Page 59 and 60: Final Report Parameter Description
- Page 61 and 62: Final Report 5. IDENTIFICATION OF C
- Page 63 and 64: Final Report Non-technical and non-
- Page 65 and 66: Final Report 6.2 SURVEY OF SATCOM S
- Page 67 and 68:
Final Report Maritime Transp
- Page 69 and 70:
Final Report 6.2.1.2.2 Ground segme
- Page 71 and 72:
Final Report Figure 20: Globalstar
- Page 73 and 74:
Final Report packet and circuit swi
- Page 75 and 76:
Final Report Handovers Given that t
- Page 77 and 78:
Final Report Routing O3b does not u
- Page 79 and 80:
Final Report Thuraya‘s satellites
- Page 81 and 82:
Final Report generation of more adv
- Page 83 and 84:
Final Report Figure 29: IS-33e Epic
- Page 85 and 86:
Final Report Figure 30: LuxGovSat s
- Page 87 and 88:
Final Report o Enviromental monitor
- Page 89 and 90:
Final Report since it is able to op
- Page 91 and 92:
Final Report Figure 34:Inmarsat 5 s
- Page 93 and 94:
Final Report 6.2.13.2.4 Services GX
- Page 95 and 96:
Final Report G/T), which allow the
- Page 97 and 98:
Final Report DAMA Random Access (RA
- Page 99 and 100:
Final Report In fact, some of these
- Page 101 and 102:
Final Report Main advantages of OFD
- Page 103 and 104:
Final Report (E-SSA) scheme. On the
- Page 105 and 106:
Final Report For each group of stak
- Page 107 and 108:
Final Report Figure 43: SOTM & Trai
- Page 109 and 110:
Final Report Other responses (not s
- Page 111 and 112:
Final Report SATCOM provides rai
- Page 113 and 114:
Final Report SOTM suitability for t
- Page 115 and 116:
Final Report Features and functiona
- Page 117 and 118:
Final Report Support for handheld t
- Page 119 and 120:
Final Report Function/service Main
- Page 121 and 122:
Final Report Concerns regarding SAT
- Page 123 and 124:
Final Report Economic feasibility o
- Page 125 and 126:
Final Report 8. PRE-SELECTION OF SA
- Page 127 and 128:
Final Report 8 9 10 GEO / X-band (D
- Page 129 and 130:
Final Report Criterion ID CRT-TECH-
- Page 131 and 132:
Final Report Criterion ID CRT-TECH-
- Page 133 and 134:
Final Report 7 - GEO / C-band 8 - G
- Page 135 and 136:
Final Report a justification regard
- Page 137 and 138:
Final Report Criterion ID Criterion
- Page 139 and 140:
Final Report Stakeholders Finance
- Page 141 and 142:
Final Report other one-time invest
- Page 143 and 144:
Final Report 9.3.2.4 Cost Model The
- Page 145 and 146:
Final Report SATCOM CAPEX Model Cos
- Page 147 and 148:
Cell Range (km) #Base Stations Fina
- Page 149 and 150:
Trips in Millions 2020 2021 2022 20
- Page 151 and 152:
M€ M€ Final Report 5.000 4.000
- Page 153 and 154:
Final Report Inmarsat 4/6 1.997 2.8
- Page 155 and 156:
M€ Final Report Regarding break-e
- Page 157 and 158:
Final Report Broadband is used as
- Page 159 and 160:
Final Report Sensitivity Ranking LT
- Page 161 and 162:
Final Report Main Cost Sensitivitie
- Page 163 and 164:
Final Report CRT-NONT-3 CRT-NONT-4
- Page 165 and 166:
Final Report 9.3.5.2 Vertical asses
- Page 167 and 168:
Final Report Criterion ID 1 2 3 4 5
- Page 169 and 170:
Final Report northern part of Europ
- Page 171 and 172:
Final Report 11.1.2 Findings regard
- Page 173 and 174:
Final Report - All the solutions ar
- Page 175 and 176:
Final Report TECHNICAL SCORE (ETCS
- Page 177 and 178:
Final Report system, since they wil
- Page 179 and 180:
Final Report the deployment of terr
- Page 181 and 182:
Final Report products and services
- Page 183 and 184:
Final Report to this weakness thank
- Page 185 and 186:
Final Report A. CRITERIA DEFINITION
- Page 187 and 188:
Final Report EEIG 96S126 / 02S1266
- Page 189 and 190:
Final Report To get high quality vo
- Page 191 and 192:
Final Report For the future railway
- Page 193 and 194:
Final Report Therefore, and as a re
- Page 195 and 196:
Final Report CRT-TECH-18 The propos
- Page 197 and 198:
Final Report The NGN architecture c
- Page 199 and 200:
Final Report IP Network Access Netw
- Page 201 and 202:
Final Report Survey on operationa
- Page 203 and 204:
Final Report RATIONALE Costs are a
- Page 205 and 206:
Final Report B. SURVEY QUESTIONS Th
- Page 207 and 208:
Final Report 4. (SATCOM) What do yo
- Page 209 and 210:
Final Report The following question
- Page 211 and 212:
Final Report a. Yes b. No 14. (cont
- Page 213 and 214:
Final Report 19. (SATCOM) Can your
- Page 215 and 216:
Final Report f. Others/ additional
- Page 217 and 218:
Final Report b. High OPEX c. Scarce
- Page 219 and 220:
Final Report C. TECHNICAL ASSESSMEN
- Page 221 and 222:
Final Report Iridium NEXT Criterion
- Page 223 and 224:
Final Report C.1.1 C.1.1.1 Addition
- Page 225 and 226:
Final Report C.2 SATCOM SOLUTION 2:
- Page 227 and 228:
Final Report MEO / C-band Criterion
- Page 229 and 230:
Final Report C.2.1 C.2.1.1 Addition
- Page 231 and 232:
Final Report T down is the propagat
- Page 233 and 234:
Final Report Inmarsat 4 (BGAN) - In
- Page 235 and 236:
Final Report Inmarsat 4 (BGAN) - In
- Page 237 and 238:
Final Report Table 55: Inmarsat 4 /
- Page 239 and 240:
Final Report C.4 SATCOM SOLUTION 4:
- Page 241 and 242:
Final Report GEO / L-band + ANTARES
- Page 243 and 244:
Final Report T up is the propagatio
- Page 245 and 246:
Final Report Thuraya Criterion ID C
- Page 247 and 248:
Final Report Thuraya Criterion ID C
- Page 249 and 250:
Final Report C.6 SATCOM SOLUTION 6:
- Page 251 and 252:
Final Report GEO / S-band Criterion
- Page 253 and 254:
Final Report GEO / S-band Criterion
- Page 255 and 256:
Final Report C.7 SATCOM SOLUTION 7:
- Page 257 and 258:
Final Report GEO / C-band Criterion
- Page 259 and 260:
Final Report GEO / C-band Criterion
- Page 261 and 262:
Final Report GEO / X-band Criterion
- Page 263 and 264:
Final Report GEO / X-band Criterion
- Page 265 and 266:
Final Report C.9 SATCOM SOLUTION 9:
- Page 267 and 268:
Final Report SmartLNB Criterion ID
- Page 269 and 270:
Final Report C.9.1 C.9.1.1 Addition
- Page 271 and 272:
Final Report C.10 SATCOM SOLUTION 1
- Page 273 and 274:
Final Report GEO / Ku-band Criterio
- Page 275 and 276:
Final Report GEO / Ku-band Criterio
- Page 277 and 278:
Final Report C.11 SATCOM SOLUTION 1
- Page 279 and 280:
Final Report Inmarsat 5 (Global Xpr
- Page 281 and 282:
Final Report Inmarsat 5 (Global Xpr
- Page 283 and 284:
Final Report C.11.1.2 Inmarsat 5 -
- Page 285:
INDRA SISTEMAS Project Manager Xavi