14.03.2017 Views

Study on feasibility of SATCOM for railway communication

SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216

SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Final Report<br />

The following questi<strong>on</strong>s are also addressed to RAIL stakeholders due to their involvement in relevant<br />

European programs, Working Groups, C<strong>on</strong>ferences, etc related to the replacement <strong>of</strong> GSM-R.<br />

9. (ALL) What are the main c<strong>on</strong>straints or problems that you can envisage <strong>for</strong> the installati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a<br />

new radio technology, in particular a satellite terminal <strong>on</strong> the train?<br />

a. C<strong>on</strong><strong>for</strong>mity with EN-50155 (e.g. envir<strong>on</strong>mental, EMI/EMC, electrical, etc.)<br />

b. Train installati<strong>on</strong> verificati<strong>on</strong><br />

c. Interoperability with other <strong>railway</strong> systems<br />

d. Others (please specify):<br />

10. (ALL) In your view, what are the main problems <strong>for</strong> satcom use in the <strong>railway</strong> domain?<br />

a. Lack <strong>of</strong> coverage throughout the journey (due to tunnels, geography/mountains,<br />

buildings, stati<strong>on</strong>s, etc)<br />

b. QoS per<strong>for</strong>mances, mainly due to the latency when using GEO systems<br />

c. Cost <strong>of</strong> operati<strong>on</strong> (OPEX)<br />

d. Cost <strong>of</strong> installati<strong>on</strong>/deployment or terminal <strong>on</strong>-board (CAPEX)<br />

e. Others (please specify):<br />

Doc.Nº: SRAIL-FNR-010-IND<br />

Edit./Rev.: 1/1<br />

Date: 16/02/2017<br />

Page 209 <strong>of</strong> 285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!