XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs
XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs
XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Digestive</strong><br />
<strong>Physiology</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Pigs</strong><br />
It is well documented that the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> exocrine<br />
pancreatic insufficient (EPI) patients supplemented with<br />
porcine pancreatic enzymes is greatly improved. However,<br />
behavioral changes during the therapy have never been<br />
studied. The present study investigated behavioral changes<br />
in total EPI pigs where the feed was supplemented with<br />
pancreatic-like enzymes <strong>of</strong> microbial origin, in addition to<br />
the effect on growth. A 2 × 4 crossover-randomized study<br />
was used to test the effect <strong>of</strong> enzyme supplementation EPI<br />
pigs that underwent pancreatic duct-ligation. After 6 weeks<br />
<strong>of</strong> recovery, the study started including 2 control and 2<br />
microbial pancreatic-like enzyme feeding periods <strong>of</strong> 10 d.<br />
At d 7 and 10 <strong>of</strong> each experimental period, behavior was<br />
monitored during 24 h and feed consumption and body<br />
weight were recorded. Behavioral observations focused on<br />
the pigs’ position: lying down/passive, sitting or standing/<br />
active and were expressed as percent activity during 24<br />
h. Body growth was totally inhibited during the recovery<br />
period, while during the study, the mean body weight <strong>of</strong><br />
the pigs increased from 10.5 ± 1.1 to 14.0 ± 1.4kg (P <<br />
0.01), despite enzyme feeding only every second week.<br />
Importantly, we found that EPI pigs were more active when<br />
fed microbial enzymes (19% /24h) then when fed control<br />
diet only (16% /24h, P < 0.01). Microbial pancreatic-like<br />
enzyme supplementation improved the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EPI pigs, but also increased their activity. This behavior<br />
contradicts the generally accepted norm according to which<br />
satiety reduces human or animal motility.<br />
Key words: behavior, pancreas, enzymes<br />
3014 Feed intake, rather than digestion is the growthlimiting<br />
factor in poor performing piglets. S. P. Paredes*<br />
1 , A. Awati 1 , A. J. M. Jansman 3 , H. M. J. van Hees 1 , M.<br />
W. A. Verstegen 2 , and W. J. J. Gerrits 2 , 1 Nutreco Research<br />
and Development, Boxmeer, The Netherlands, 2 Animal<br />
Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The<br />
Netherlands, 3 Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Lelystad,<br />
The Netherlands.<br />
Variation in body weight gain during the nursery period has a<br />
large economic impact in pig production. Understanding the<br />
reasons for variation in animal performance and the factors<br />
that limit growth could result in management strategies to<br />
reduce this variation. To this aim, 2 distinct sub populations<br />
(Poor performers, P; High performers, H) <strong>of</strong> clinically healthy<br />
pigs were selected at 3 weeks post weaning (~6 weeks <strong>of</strong><br />
age) based on an equation including BW at birth, weaning, 3<br />
wk post weaning and sex. At 6 wk <strong>of</strong> age, P pigs (6.8 kg BW,<br />
SE 0.14) and H pigs (12.2 kg BW, SE 0.14), were housed<br />
individually in a high hygiene research facility and provided<br />
with high quality palatable diet (175 g/kg CP; 10.6 MJ NE;<br />
13.5 g/kg AID Lys) until 10 wk <strong>of</strong> age. <strong>Pigs</strong> had ad libitum<br />
access to feed and water. Apparent ileal (slaughter) and total<br />
tract nutrient digestibility were measured. It was observed that<br />
fractional growth rate (i.e., ADG expressed as percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
mean BW) was lower for H pigs than for P pigs (3.0 vs 3.3%;<br />
P < 0.01). ADFI was higher for H pigs (275 g/d higher; P<br />
< 0.001) than for P pigs throughout the 4 wk experimental<br />
period, while feed efficiency was not different. At the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the experimental period, H pigs were heavier compared with<br />
<strong>XII</strong> INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON<br />
DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF PIGS<br />
121<br />
Session V<br />
P pigs (30 vs. 19 kg BW), had greater body length (73 vs.<br />
62 cm) and head circumference (49 vs. 43 cm), all P < 0.05.<br />
Apparent ileal digestibility (0.78, 0.80 and 0.81 for DM, GE<br />
and N, respectively) and total tract digestibility (0.87, 0.87 and<br />
0.84 for DM, GE and N, respectively) were similar for P and<br />
H pigs. In conclusion, when compared with high performers,<br />
piglets identified as poor performers continued their poor<br />
performance during individual housing and optimized rearing<br />
conditions until 10 wk <strong>of</strong> age. The substantial difference in<br />
BW at 10 wk was related to differences in feed intake rather<br />
than to digestive utilization or feed conversion efficiency. We<br />
can deduct from these observations that the determinants for<br />
body weight at the end <strong>of</strong> the nursery period are already set<br />
during the first weeks <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
Key words: growth, limiting, digestion<br />
3015 Efficacy <strong>of</strong> prebiotics on lactose digestibility,<br />
whole body protein metabolic status and growth performance<br />
in replacing antibiotics in weanling pigs fed<br />
corn, soybean meal and dried-whey powder based<br />
diets. M. Hayhoe,* T. Archbold, Q. Wang, X. Yang, and M.<br />
Fan, University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.<br />
This study was conducted to determine effects 4 prebiotic<br />
supplements on lactose digestibility, protein metabolic<br />
status and performance <strong>of</strong> weanling pigs in comparison with<br />
2 control diets containing an antibiotic growth promoter or<br />
without antibiotics. Six experimental diets were corn (40%)<br />
and SBM (28%) based and supplemented with fish meal<br />
(9%) and dried whey powder (20%). Diet 1, being a negative<br />
control, was the basal diet, containing no antibiotics and<br />
supplemental prebiotics. Diet 2, being a positive control,<br />
was formulated by adding an antibiotic lincommix 44 at<br />
0.10%. Diets 3 to 6 were formulated to contain 0.75% <strong>of</strong><br />
4 test prebiotics <strong>of</strong> inulin, β-glucan, resistant cornstarch<br />
and Fibersol-2, respectively. Titanium oxide (0.30%) was<br />
included as a digestibility marker. A total <strong>of</strong> 144 Yorkshire<br />
pigs, at the age <strong>of</strong> 21 d with an average initial BW <strong>of</strong> 9.7<br />
kg, were allocated to the 6 diets for 21 d according to a<br />
randomized block design. Initial and final BW, PUN and<br />
ADFI were measured. Fecal samples were collected on<br />
d 11. Data were analyzed by using SAS procmixed model<br />
and Dunnett’s test. There were no differences (P > 0.05)<br />
in ADG, ADFI, feed to gain ratio, PUN and the lactose<br />
digestibility between each <strong>of</strong> the 4 prebiotic treatment<br />
groups and the antibiotic group or the negative control<br />
group, respectively. Furthermore, there were no differences<br />
(P > 0.05) in these endpoints between the antibiotic and the<br />
negative control groups. Total tract lactose digestibility was<br />
measured to be at 100% in these diets, consistent with the<br />
previously estimated whole gut lactase digestive capacity<br />
in weanling pigs. The lack <strong>of</strong> antibiotic effects on total tract<br />
lactose digestibility would suggest that lactose (10.7%) in<br />
these diets was enzymatically digested by the host in the<br />
weanling pigs. These results suggest that supplemental<br />
prebiotics or feed antibiotics were not effective for further<br />
improving growth performance and body protein utilization<br />
in the weanling piglets under our experimental conditions.<br />
Key words: prebiotics, antibiotics, weanling pigs