13.12.2012 Views

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Digestive</strong><br />

<strong>Physiology</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Pigs</strong><br />

and 3,029 kcal/kg and those in PKM were 3,043, 3,005<br />

and 2,959 kcal/kg, respectively. As-fed basis and/or DM<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> DE, ME and MEn in CM was slightly higher than<br />

PKM when 2 ingredients were supplemented in growing<br />

pigs′ diet. The ME to DE ratios <strong>of</strong> CM and PKM were<br />

calculated at 94.7 and 98.5%, respectively. Consequently,<br />

CM and PKM have similar metabolizable energy values in<br />

growing pigs; however, nutrient digestibility varied among<br />

ingredients.<br />

Key words: metabolizable energy, copra meal, palm kernel<br />

meal<br />

1089 high vs. low amylose starch increases methane<br />

and volatile fatty acid production and reduces<br />

energy retention in pigs. J. L. Yanez* 1,2 , S. Moehn 1 , R. O.<br />

Ball 1 , T. A. T.G. van Kempen 3 , and R. T. Zijlstra 1 , 1 University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2 Universidad<br />

Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, México, 3 North Carolina<br />

State University, Raleigh, North Caroline, United States.<br />

The energy contribution <strong>of</strong> starch is usually considered<br />

constant among starch types. However, starch chemistry<br />

can impact its kinetics <strong>of</strong> digestion and fermentation and<br />

thus net energy content. In a double 4 × 4 Latin square,<br />

pigs were fed 4 diets containing 70% purified starch (S1,<br />

S2, S3 and S4 with 0, 20, 28 and 63% amylose; reflected<br />

by in vitro maximal digestion rate; 1.06, 0.73, 0.38, and<br />

0.22%/min, respectively), casein and fishmeal; TiO 2 was<br />

added as indigestible marker. Eight barrows (40.7 ± 2.08<br />

kg BW) were fed 4 diets at 2.8 × maintenance <strong>of</strong> DE in 4<br />

7-d periods. Feces were collected on d 6 and immediately<br />

stored at −20°C for digestibility or at −80°C for VFA<br />

analyses. <strong>Pigs</strong> were transferred into indirect calorimetry<br />

chambers (184 × 78 × 102 cm) configured with stabilized<br />

gas analyzers. Then, readings were obtained for 24 h<br />

on d 7 to measure O 2 consumption, and CO 2 and CH 4<br />

production. Diet and achieved feed intake were included<br />

in the statistical model. The O 2 consumption was higher<br />

(P < 0.05) for S3, intermediate for S4 and lowest for S1<br />

and S2. The CO 2 production was higher (P < 0.05) for S3<br />

than S1, S2 and S4. The CH 4 was similar (P < 0.01) at<br />

0.012 L/min for S1 to S3, then higher (P < 0.01) to 0.34<br />

L/min for S4. Heat production was higher (P < 0.05) 16.7<br />

MJ/d for S3, intermediate 15.7 MJ/d for S4 and lower for<br />

S1 and S2 14.9 and 15.1 MJ/d, respectively. The ATTD <strong>of</strong><br />

energy and DE content was similar for rapidly to moderate<br />

slowly digestible starch but was reduced (P < 0.05) by<br />

8% for slowly digestible starch. Reducing rate <strong>of</strong> starch<br />

digestion increased (P < 0.05) concentration in fecal (wet)<br />

matter butyrate, valerate and caproate indicating increased<br />

starch fermentation. Increasing amylose or reducing rate <strong>of</strong><br />

starch in vitro digestion gradually reduced (P < 0.05) diet<br />

NE content from 12.6 MJ/kg for S1 and S2, via 11.3 for S3<br />

to 10.8 MJ/kg for S4. In conclusion, high amylose starch<br />

increased CH 4 production and reduced NE content due to<br />

increased fermentation instead <strong>of</strong> digestion.<br />

Key words: energy, pig, starch<br />

1090 Influence on the ileal and fecal digestibility <strong>of</strong><br />

forage inclusion in the diet. H. Jørgensen,* D. Carlson,<br />

<strong>XII</strong> INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON<br />

DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF PIGS<br />

73<br />

Session II<br />

and H. N. Lærke, Aarhus University, Department <strong>of</strong> animal<br />

Science, Foulum, Denmark.<br />

Forage, which is mainly characterized by a high content<br />

<strong>of</strong> dietary fiber, is a potential feedstuff or additive for<br />

monogastric animals to improve health and sustainability.<br />

The present study aimed to study the ileal and fecal<br />

digestibility <strong>of</strong> 3 forages (Clover grass, Clover grass<br />

silage and Pea-Barley silage) supplemented to a basal<br />

diet. A total <strong>of</strong> 24 pigs, adapted to eating forages by<br />

supplemented with clover grass silage from weaning,<br />

were fitted with a T-cannulas at the terminal ileum at<br />

approximate 30 kg LW. For each <strong>of</strong> the 3 types <strong>of</strong> forage, 2<br />

balance trials with 4 weeks interval were carried out. Two<br />

pigs in each test were fed the basal diet while 6 others<br />

were fed the basal diet plus forage throughout the whole<br />

experiment. The forages were <strong>of</strong>fered the pigs the first 40<br />

min at each feeding thereafter removed and the basal diet<br />

supplied. After the last collection, the pigs were sacrificed<br />

and digesta collected from the digestive tract 3 h after<br />

the morning meal. The intake <strong>of</strong> forages was relative low<br />

and quite variable and accounted on average for only<br />

10–12% <strong>of</strong> the daily dry matter intake. Ileal digestibility<br />

estimated by collection from the T-cannulas was higher<br />

than the digestibility estimated by the slaughter technique<br />

indicating some separation <strong>of</strong> the digesta collected from<br />

the T-cannulas. The forages had, as expected, a lower<br />

DM and energy digestibility than the basal diet (P < 0.05).<br />

The fresh clover grass had a higher energy digestibility<br />

than the 2 silages (60 vs 48%, P < 0.05). Inclusion <strong>of</strong> 10%<br />

<strong>of</strong> gross energy in the diet from clover grass reduced the<br />

rations energy digestibility relatively by 2.2%, while clover<br />

grass silage and the pea-barley silage lead to reductions<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3.4 and 5.0% (P < 0.05), respectively. In organic pig<br />

production forages like the ones used in the present study<br />

can play an important role in satiety and rooting behavior.<br />

However, the contribution to the overall energy supply is<br />

limited.<br />

Key words: roughage, energy value, fibrous feedstuff<br />

1091 <strong>Digestive</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> diets with low or high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> fibers in pigs divergently selected for residual<br />

feed intake. L. Montagne 1,2 , M. Le Gall* 1,2 , and H. Gilbert 3,4 ,<br />

1 Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 PEGASE, 35000 Rennes,<br />

France, 2 INRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, 35590 St-Gilles,<br />

France, 3 INRA, UMR1313 GABI, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas,<br />

France, 4 INRA, UMR444 LGC, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan,<br />

France.<br />

Residual feed intake (RFI) is the difference between<br />

observed and theoretical daily feed intake (DFI) estimated<br />

from maintenance and production requirements. Genetic<br />

selection to lower RFI is considered to improve feed<br />

efficiency. Divergent selection on RFI was conducted<br />

for 6 generations in 2 Large White lines: the RFI+<br />

consumed more feed than predicted compared with<br />

the RFI–. Metabolism and activity could contribute to<br />

RFI differences between the lines. Digestion has been<br />

previously reported not to differ between these lines<br />

when pigs were fed a regular diet. This study aimed to<br />

determine the digestibility coefficients <strong>of</strong> a high fiber (244

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!