XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs
XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs
XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Digestive</strong><br />
<strong>Physiology</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Pigs</strong><br />
> 0.05) on the ATTD <strong>of</strong> energy among treatments. <strong>Pigs</strong> fed<br />
the S1.0 diet had higher (P < 0.05) serum Fe concentration<br />
compared with those fed the CON and S0.5 diets at the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> the experiment. There was no difference in total<br />
iron–binding capacity among dietary treatments. Dietary<br />
application <strong>of</strong> sericite didn′t affect the ammonia, hydrogen<br />
sulfide, and total mercaptans emission on d 1, 3, 5, and 7.<br />
In conclusion, dietary supplementation with 0.5 and 1.0%<br />
sericite increased the ATTD <strong>of</strong> DM and N, whereas the<br />
inclusion <strong>of</strong> 1.0% sericite reduced serum Fe concentration<br />
in growing pigs.<br />
Key words: apparent total tract digestibility, sericite, growing<br />
pigs<br />
1078 effects <strong>of</strong> faba beans and faba bean hulls on the<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> selected genes in the small intestine <strong>of</strong><br />
piglets. A. J. M. Jansman,* J. van Baal, H. C. A. Widjaja,<br />
J. van der Meulen, and M. A. Smits, Wageningen UR Livestock<br />
Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.<br />
In a study using the small intestinal perfusion technique<br />
in pigs, the effects were studied <strong>of</strong> intestinal perfusion<br />
<strong>of</strong> ground fava beans, fava bean hulls or saline on the<br />
intestinal net fluid absorption in intestinal segments<br />
either or not challenged with an enterotoxigenic E. coli<br />
(ETEC). After an 8 h perfusion test, the piglets were<br />
euthanized and small intestinal mucosa samples were<br />
taken for analyzing the expression <strong>of</strong> several selected<br />
genes, which were previously shown to be responsive<br />
toward an ETEC challenge. Samples <strong>of</strong> frozen <strong>of</strong> the<br />
jejunal mucosa were ground in liquid nitrogen and total<br />
RNA was extracted and purified. Real-time quantitative<br />
PCR (qPCR) was performed. Each sample was run in<br />
duplicate. The expression <strong>of</strong> the following genes coding<br />
for the following proteins was quantified relative to the<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> 18S RNA: 1) apolipoproteine C3 (ApoC3), 2)<br />
metalloproteinase 1 inhibitor (TIMP1), 3) aquaporine 8<br />
(AQP8), 4) matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), 5) mucin<br />
13 (MUC13) and 6) pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP).<br />
There was a significant interaction between the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
perfusion treatment (saline, fava beans or fava bean hulls)<br />
and ETEC challenge on the expression <strong>of</strong> the genes in<br />
mucosal tissue, except for MUC13. Nature <strong>of</strong> the perfusion<br />
treatment had a significant effect on the expression <strong>of</strong><br />
AQP8 and MUC13, while the ETEC challenge had a<br />
significant effect on the expression <strong>of</strong> all selected genes,<br />
except for MUC13. The expression <strong>of</strong> APOC3 and<br />
AQP8 was increased by the ETEC challenge, while the<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> TIMP1, MMP and PAP was decreased as<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> the ETEC challenge. Overall, the expression <strong>of</strong><br />
APOC3 and AQP8 was negatively correlated with net fluid<br />
absorption, while the expression <strong>of</strong> TIMP1, MMP1 and PAP<br />
was positively correlated with net fluid absorption. It was<br />
concluded that the expression <strong>of</strong> ETEC responsive genes<br />
in the small intestinal mucosa is affected by perfusion with<br />
fava beans and fava bean hulls and challenge with ETEC.<br />
The expression <strong>of</strong> several genes (APOC3, AQP8, TIMP1,<br />
MMP and PAP) was correlated with the net fluid absorption<br />
in the small intestine <strong>of</strong> pigs.<br />
Key words: intestinal gene expression, faba beans<br />
<strong>XII</strong> INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON<br />
DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF PIGS<br />
69<br />
Session II<br />
1079 Improved nutrient digestibility and retention<br />
partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected<br />
for low residual feed intake. A. J. Harris,* J. F. Patience,<br />
S. M. Lonergan, J. C. M. Dekkers, and N. K. Gabler, Iowa<br />
State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.<br />
Residual feed intake (RFI) is a unique measure <strong>of</strong> feed<br />
efficiency (FE) and an alternative to traditional measures<br />
<strong>of</strong> gain:feed or feed:gain. It is defined as the difference<br />
between the actual feed intake <strong>of</strong> a pig and its expected feed<br />
intake based on its level <strong>of</strong> growth and backfat. Therefore,<br />
selecting for a pig with low RFI results in a more feed<br />
efficient animal for a given rate <strong>of</strong> growth. Our objective was<br />
to determine the extent to which apparent total tract nutrient<br />
digestibility (ATTD), energy utilization and retention explain<br />
FE differences between pigs divergently selected for low or<br />
high RFI. After 7 generations <strong>of</strong> selection, 12 high (HRFI)<br />
and 12 low RFI (LRFI) pigs (62 ± 3 kg BW), were randomly<br />
assigned to metabolism crates. <strong>Pigs</strong> were fed ad libitum<br />
a standard corn-soy diet containing 0.4% titanium oxide,<br />
an exogenous digestibility marker. After a 7 d acclimation<br />
period, total urine and feces collection was undertaken for<br />
72 h. Nutrient and energy digestibility, P digestibility and N<br />
balance were then measured and calculated to determine<br />
differences between the RFI lines. As expected, ADFI was<br />
significantly lower in the LRFI pigs (2.0 vs 2.6 kg/d, P <<br />
0.01), ADG did not differ, and FE was significantly higher<br />
in the LRFI (P = 0.0003) compared with the HRFI pigs. The<br />
digestibility coefficients for DM (87.3 vs 85.9%), N (88.3 vs<br />
86.1%), and GE (86.9 vs 85.4%) were higher (P ≤ 0.003)<br />
in the LRFI versus HRFI pigs, respectively. DE (16.59 vs<br />
16.32 MJ/kg DM) and ME (15.98 vs 15.72 MJ/kg DM)<br />
values were also significantly greater (P = 0.0006) in the<br />
LRFI pigs. When correcting for ADFI, P digestibility did not<br />
differ between the lines. However, the LRFI pigs tended to<br />
have improved N retention compared with HRFI pigs (36.91<br />
vs 32.12 g/d, P = 0.08). These data suggest that differences<br />
in energy and nutrient digestibility, utilization, and retention<br />
may partially explain the superior FE seen in pigs selected<br />
for LRFI.<br />
Key words: residual feed intake, feed efficiency, nutrient<br />
digestibility<br />
1080 Dietary protein content does not influence calcium<br />
and phosphorus absorption and retention in the<br />
Iberian pig growing from 50 to 100 kg body-weight. R.<br />
Nieto,* A. Haro, C. Delgado-Andrade, I. Seiquer, and J. F.<br />
Aguilera, Institute <strong>of</strong> Animal Nutrition, Estación Experimental<br />
del Zaidín, CSIC, Granada, Spain.<br />
The comparatively slower growth rate <strong>of</strong> the Iberian<br />
pig suggests lower Ca and P requirements than those<br />
reported for conventional or high-performing porcine<br />
breeds. The effects <strong>of</strong> dietary apparent-digestible protein<br />
content (ApDP) from excessive to marginally deficient<br />
(113, 93, 74 and 53 g/kg DM) and level <strong>of</strong> feeding (FL;<br />
0.80 and 0.95 x ad libitum) upon whole-body retention <strong>of</strong><br />
Ca and P was studied in 48 purebred Iberian barrows in<br />
the finishing stage from 50 to 100 kg BW. The diets were<br />
prepared by diluting a high-protein diet (HPC), formulated<br />
according to the ideal protein concept, with a protein-free