13.12.2012 Views

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Digestive</strong><br />

<strong>Physiology</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Pigs</strong><br />

The pro-inflammatory response induced by the LPS was<br />

suppressed by one extract <strong>of</strong> Ascophyllum nodosum which<br />

inhibited the expression <strong>of</strong> IL8, IL6 and TNFα genes to 0.99<br />

± 0.53 (P < 0.05), 0.75 ± 0.33 (P < 0.05) and 1.01 ± 0.17<br />

(P < 0.05) fold, respectively. One extract <strong>of</strong> Fucus serratus<br />

also inhibited the expression <strong>of</strong> these cytokine genes as<br />

induced by LPS to 0.70 ± 0.32 (P < 0.01), 0.69 ± 0.38 (P <<br />

0.05) and 1.15 ± 0.25 fold, respectively. It is concluded that<br />

the extracts <strong>of</strong> Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus serratus<br />

seaweeds have potential to suppress the pro-inflammatory<br />

response induced by the bacterial LPS in the pig colon.<br />

Key words: anti-inflammatory, cytokine, bioactive<br />

1032 The addition <strong>of</strong> a Bacillus licheniformis CeCT<br />

4536 probiotic to piglet diets improves animal intestinal<br />

microbiota and performance parameters. J. J.<br />

Mallo* 1 , M. Oficialdegui 2 , M. I. Gracia 3 , M. Gutierrez 1 , and<br />

P. Honrubia 1 , 1 Norel S.A., Madrid, Spain, 2 Granja Los Alecos<br />

S.A., Navarra, Spain, 3 Imasde Agroalimentaria S.L.,<br />

Madrid, Spain.<br />

The trial investigated the effects <strong>of</strong> adding a new probiotic,<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> spores <strong>of</strong> B. licheniformis strain CECT 4536<br />

(10 9 cfu/g <strong>of</strong> product) to a standard piglet post-weaning<br />

feeding program (C) on intestinal microbiota and growth<br />

performance. The probiotic was added at a dosage <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

kg/T <strong>of</strong> feed, giving a bacterial concentration <strong>of</strong> 10 6 cfu/g <strong>of</strong><br />

feed (T). In this trial 480 piglets were randomly housed in 16<br />

pens and monitored from d 21 to 74 <strong>of</strong> age for differences<br />

in performance parameters. Results were analyzed with a<br />

PROC GLM test. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> the probiotic produced<br />

heavier piglets; at the end <strong>of</strong> the trial, T piglets tended to<br />

weigh more than C piglets (22.9 vs 21.7 kg; P < 0.12).<br />

Additionally, the inclusion <strong>of</strong> B. licheniformis tended to<br />

improve piglet growth during the trial (337 vs 313 g/d; P<br />

< 0.12) and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) (1.54 vs 1.67<br />

g feed/g gain; P < 0.12). These differences were mainly<br />

produced in the last 2 wk <strong>of</strong> the trial, where the T animals<br />

tended to grow more (+10.8%; 706 vs 637 g/d; P < 0.12),<br />

and had better FCR (−20%; 1.36 vs 1.70 g feed/g gain; P <<br />

0.05) than C animals. At the same time, samples <strong>of</strong> feces<br />

were taken at d 0, 21 and 53 <strong>of</strong> trial to evaluate how the<br />

probiotic affected fecal micr<strong>of</strong>lora. The use <strong>of</strong> the probiotic<br />

showed higher counts <strong>of</strong> lactobacilli in feces (6.52 log10 vs<br />

5.76 log10; P < 0.05) at d 53; with no statistical differences in<br />

total mesophilic bacteria, coliforms, clostridia or salmonella<br />

at d 53, and no differences at d 0 or 21. It was, therefore,<br />

concluded that the addition <strong>of</strong> B. licheniformis CECT 4536<br />

at a dosage <strong>of</strong> 106 cfu/g to the diet improves intestinal<br />

microbiota balance in the piglets and promotes an easier<br />

transition to solid feed, producing higher body weights,<br />

better growth and improved feed conversion after weaning.<br />

Key words: probiotic, bacillus, micr<strong>of</strong>lora<br />

1033 Influence <strong>of</strong> antibiotic treatment <strong>of</strong> sows on<br />

intestinal microbiota in their <strong>of</strong>fsprings. J. Zhang* 1 , O.<br />

Peréz 1 , J. P. Lallès 2 , and H. Smidt 1 , 1 Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Microbiology,<br />

Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703<br />

HB Wageningen, the Netherlands, 2 Institut National de la<br />

<strong>XII</strong> INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON<br />

DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF PIGS<br />

50<br />

Session I<br />

Recherche Agronomique, UR1341 ADNC, F-35590 Saint-<br />

Gilles, France.<br />

Early disturbance by antibiotic treatment on the microbial<br />

colonization process can have drastic consequences for<br />

gastrointestinal tract development. This study aimed at<br />

evaluating the effects <strong>of</strong> amoxicillin treatment (AT) <strong>of</strong> sows<br />

before and after farrowing on the intestinal microbiota in<br />

their <strong>of</strong>fspring during the suckling and the post-weaning<br />

period. Two groups <strong>of</strong> 4 sows each were defined as control<br />

and treatment. In the treatment, sows were treated orally<br />

with amoxicillin (40 mg/kg BW/d) during 10 d before and<br />

21 d after parturition. Feces <strong>of</strong> sows were collected at<br />

the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> the AT. Offsprings (1/sow/<br />

time) were sacrificed at d 14, 21, 28 and 42 after birth, to<br />

collect ileal digesta. The microbial composition <strong>of</strong> feces<br />

and ileal digesta was analyzed by the Pig Gastrointestinal<br />

Tract Chip. Cluster analysis <strong>of</strong> microbiota pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> sows<br />

showed separate grouping <strong>of</strong> samples from treated sows<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> AT. This was further confirmed by principal<br />

response curves (PRC) analysis which showed a large<br />

deviation <strong>of</strong> the treatment from the control at the end <strong>of</strong> AT<br />

and indicated a significant effect (P = 0.045) <strong>of</strong> AT. PRC<br />

analysis revealed a reduction <strong>of</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> Mycoplasmalike,<br />

L. gasseri-like, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica-like<br />

and L. delbrueckii-like organisms <strong>of</strong> treated sows. Cluster<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> ileal microbiota <strong>of</strong> piglets showed samples from<br />

d 42 grouped in a distinct assembly, while all other samples<br />

formed, with few exceptions, 2 clusters according to<br />

treatment, indicating AT <strong>of</strong> sows influenced the microbiota<br />

<strong>of</strong> piglets. Microbial diversity <strong>of</strong> piglets derived from treated<br />

sows was lower than that <strong>of</strong> controls at all time points,<br />

and was significantly different at d 42(P = 0.018). The<br />

PRC analysis showed deviations <strong>of</strong> the treatment from the<br />

control at each sampling point and confirmed the sustained<br />

AT effect on the ileal microbiota. Reduction <strong>of</strong> L. gasserilike<br />

and Mycoplasma-like organisms <strong>of</strong> sows caused by<br />

AT also appeared in digesta <strong>of</strong> piglets. In conclusion, pre-<br />

and postpartum AT had a significant effect on intestinal<br />

microbiota <strong>of</strong> sows, which in turn influenced the microbial<br />

colonization <strong>of</strong> their <strong>of</strong>fspring.<br />

Key words: microbiota, amoxicillin, piglet<br />

1034 Effects <strong>of</strong> yeast-dried milk (YDM) product in<br />

creep and Phase-1 nursery diets on circulating IgA and<br />

fecal microbiota <strong>of</strong> nursing and nursery pigs. H. Tran,*<br />

J. W. Bundy, E. E. Hinkle, J. Walter, P. S. Miller, and T. E.<br />

Burkey, University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.<br />

Four experiments were conducted to evaluate effects <strong>of</strong><br />

YDM in creep and phase-1 nursery diets. In Exp. 1, 24<br />

parity-4 litters (8 litters/trt) were used. Dietary treatments<br />

included: No creep (NC), Control creep (CTL), and<br />

Experimental creep (EC; 10% YDM). Creep diets were fed<br />

ad libitum from d 7 after birth until weaning. In Exp. 2, 108<br />

weaned pigs (BW, 7.2 kg) were selected based on mean<br />

BW <strong>of</strong> pigs from each <strong>of</strong> 3 treatments in Exp. 1 and assigned<br />

to 1 <strong>of</strong> 18 pens (6 pens/trt). <strong>Pigs</strong> fed creep diets during Exp.<br />

1 received the same diet during phase 1 <strong>of</strong> Exp. 2, followed<br />

by a common diet containing antibiotics in phase 2 (d 7 to<br />

21). Blood and fecal samples were collected at weaning,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!