13.12.2012 Views

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Digestive</strong><br />

<strong>Physiology</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Pigs</strong><br />

d 7, 14, and 21 postweaning (pw) to evaluate serum IgA<br />

and fecal microbiota. In Exp. 2, pigs fed CTL and EC had<br />

greater (P = 0.10 and 0.03; respectively) IgA compared with<br />

NC pigs. On d 7 post-weaning, pigs fed EC had greater (P<br />

= 0.005) microbial diversity compared with CTL; however,<br />

there was no difference in diversity indices between EC<br />

and NC pigs. In addition, microbial similarity within group<br />

decreased (P < 0.05) in pigs fed EC compared with other<br />

treatments on d 7 and 21 pw. Overall (d 0 to 14), lactobacilli<br />

16S rRNA gene copy numbers were greater (P = 0.03) in<br />

EC (7.3 log 10 ) compared with NC pigs (6.9 log 10 ). Exp. 3 (23<br />

parity-1 litters; 7 litters/trt) had the same treatment design<br />

as Exp. 1. There was lower (P = 0.02) L. reuteri in the CTL<br />

(5.1 log 10 ) compared with NC pigs (5.6 log 10 ). In Exp. 4,<br />

108 weaned pigs (BW, 6.6 kg) were selected based on the<br />

mean BW <strong>of</strong> all pigs from Exp. 3 and assigned to 18 pens (6<br />

pens/trt). Exp. 4 had the same experimental design as Exp.<br />

2 except no antibiotic was included in phase-2 diet. <strong>Pigs</strong> fed<br />

CTL (4.8 log 10 ) and EC (4.8 log 10 ) had lower (P < 0.01) fecal<br />

L. johnsonii compared with NC pigs (5.2 log 10 ). Lactobacilli,<br />

L. johnsonii, and L. reuteri gene copy numbers decreased<br />

(P < 0.001) from d 7 to d 21 postfarrowing (Exp. 3) and<br />

increased at d 7 post-weaning (Exp. 4). Microbial ecology<br />

and immune parameters in nursing and nursery pigs may<br />

be affected by YDM product.<br />

Key words: immunoglobulin A, microbiota, yeast<br />

1035 evaluation <strong>of</strong> the growth performance and fecal<br />

microbiota pr<strong>of</strong>ile in developing gilts fed high-fiber<br />

diets. W. Burger,* H. Tran, J. W. Bundy, E. E. Hinkle, R.<br />

K. Johnson, P. S. Miller, and T. E. Burkey, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.<br />

Restricting feed and energy intake during gilt development<br />

improves lifetime productivity and lowers breakeven selling<br />

prices for market pigs. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> dietary insoluble fiber<br />

<strong>XII</strong> INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON<br />

DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF PIGS<br />

51<br />

Session I<br />

at high concentrations is a strategy to limit energy intake<br />

in gilts fed ad libitum. Thus, an experiment was conducted<br />

to evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> low energy feedstuffs on growth<br />

performance and fecal microbial pr<strong>of</strong>iles in developing gilts<br />

fed high-fiber diets in a 4-wk feeding period. Fifty-six gilts<br />

(initial BW, 83.4 ± 2.3 kg) were housed in individual pens<br />

and 8 pens were assigned to each <strong>of</strong> 7 treatments: 1) control<br />

(corn-soybean meal; CTL); 2) alfalfa (ALFA); 3) beet pulp<br />

(BEET); 4) corn bran (CBRA); 5) corn cobs (COBS); 6) rice<br />

hulls (RIHU); and 7) soy hulls (SOHU). The experimental<br />

diets were formulated to contain approximately 80% ME<br />

values <strong>of</strong> the CTL diet. Pig BW were recorded (d 0, 8,<br />

15, 21, and 28) for ADG, ADFI, and GF calculation. Fecal<br />

samples were collected (3 pigs/treatment) coinciding with<br />

BW measurements for microbial diversity and similarity<br />

analyses using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.<br />

Overall, decreases (P < 0.05) in BW (in gilts fed BEET<br />

and COBS), ADG (in gilts fed ALFA, BEET, and COBS),<br />

and ADFI (in gilts fed BEET) were observed compared<br />

with CTL gilts. In addition, gilts fed RIHU had increased<br />

(P < 0.05) ADFI compared with the CTL. With respect to<br />

microbial pr<strong>of</strong>iles, there were no differences in microbial<br />

similarity coefficient within group or diversity indices among<br />

gilts fed various sources <strong>of</strong> dietary fiber on d 0, 8, and 15;<br />

however, gilts fed ALFA (d 21), BEET (d 28), and SOHU (d<br />

28) had greater (P < 0.05) microbial diversity (Shannon′s<br />

and Simpson′s) compared with the CTL. Gilts fed RIHU,<br />

COBS, and CBRA had greater (P = 0.03) similarity within<br />

group on d 28 compared with the CTL. There was lower<br />

(P < 0.01) bacterial similarity between CTL and SOHU<br />

pigs on d 28 (65%) compared with d 0 (91%). Briefly, high<br />

fiber feedstuffs affect growth performance and microbial<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles; however, further research is needed to evaluate<br />

how changes in gut microbes affect lifetime productivity and<br />

health <strong>of</strong> developing gilts and their progeny.<br />

Key words: fiber, gilt, microbial diversity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!