02.03.2018 Views

Islams Reformers

The bigotry of the religion reformers or bigots of science who surfaced lately to blame all previous scholars, basic fundamental beliefs or practices

The bigotry of the religion reformers or bigots of science who surfaced lately to blame all previous scholars, basic fundamental beliefs or practices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

al-Islâm Ibn Hajar al-Askalânî.” [1]<br />

It would be extremely insolent, unfair and unreasonable to<br />

suppose that the greatest scholars like al-Baidâwî, Imâm al-<br />

Ghazâlî, Jalâl ad-dîn as-Suyûtî, Sadr ad-dîn al-Qonawî and<br />

Sanâ’ullâh Pâniputî were too ignorant to distinguish a sahîh<br />

hadîth from a made-up hadîth, or to suppose that they were as<br />

irreligious as not to protect their religion or not to feel pangs of<br />

conscience in recording made-up hadîths as sahîh hadîths. We<br />

have told at length in the seventh and eighth paragraphs of our<br />

book how strictly Islamic scholars studied hadîths. An intelligent<br />

and reasonable person who reads those writings will certainly<br />

realize that a religion reformer, who shows so much effrontery as<br />

to say that there are concocted hadîths in the books written by<br />

such a great scholar as Imâm al-Ghazâlî, would have deserved it if<br />

his tongue were cut off or his books were burned to ashes. To say<br />

that those exalted scholars could not understand the hadîths while<br />

their successor Ibn Taimiyya could is a fallacy that would ill befit<br />

anyone with the exception of the enemies of the Ahl as-Sunna<br />

scholars. Those who cannot comprehend the greatness of Islamic<br />

scholars suppose that those exalted leaders also wrote with their<br />

short reasons and aberrant thoughts, like these people do. Their<br />

sophistry stoops to such low levels as to say, “Al-Ghazâlî’s<br />

discernment was obscured under the bad influence of social<br />

ideas.” They cannot realize that each of his writings is an<br />

explanation of âyats and hadîths. If a person who praises al-Imâm<br />

ar-Rabbânî is sincere in his word and if he likes that exalted<br />

leader’s writings, he should follow these writings and love the Ahl<br />

as-Sunna scholars, whom al-Imâm ar-Rabbânî praises highly, and<br />

he should not be disrespectful towards them. One should be a<br />

scholar to appreciate the value of another scholar. Not to realize<br />

the value of the Ahl as-Sunna scholars, or to strive to blemish and<br />

criticize those blessed persons, causes one to depart from al-firqat<br />

an-nâjiyya (the Group of Salvation), and he who departs from<br />

Ahl as-Sunna becomes either a heretic or an unbeliever. [2] As it is<br />

written on page 65 of the book Hidâyat al-muwaffiqîn by Abû<br />

Muhammad Viltorî, one of the ’ulamâ’ of India, ’Allâma Ahmad<br />

[1] Imâm Muhammad al-Birghiwî, Usûl al-hadîth, p. 91.<br />

[2] Mawlânâ Hamd-Allah ad-Dajwî, al-Basâ’ir li-munkirî’t-tawassuli biahl<br />

al-maqâbir, Pashawar, Pakistan, 1385, p. 52.<br />

– 266 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!