26.12.2012 Views

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REFERENCES 113<br />

Example I. As example C shows, pronounced differences in effective mobilities can be<br />

expected if instead of water methanol is used as solvent. Example G shows some differences<br />

in effective mobilities, due to the change in pH. The differences in the effective<br />

mobilities, as found in the various systems, always must be interpreted carefully. The<br />

influence of the counter ion, the solvent and the pH always results in changes in the<br />

effective mobilities of the various ionic species considered. Therefore another example of<br />

these various effects can be given.<br />

Fig.5.12 shows clearly the influence of the various systems on the effective mobilities<br />

(step heights) of the cations. The systems WHCl, WAC, MHCl and MKAc are listed in<br />

Tables 11.1, 11.3, 16.4 and 16.5, respectively.<br />

The behaviour of the cations K, Na and Li is similar, while highly charged cations such<br />

as Ce, Al and Pb show shifts due to effects of pH and complex formation. A large shift is<br />

shown for the tetraethylammonium ion in the aqueous and methanolic systems due to the<br />

effect of solvation and change of dielectric constant of the solvent.<br />

Much more information about this subject can be found in the literature considering<br />

“structure breaking” and “structure making” properties of ionic species.<br />

Moreover, in methanolic systems the influence of a change in pH on the divalent<br />

cations is remarkable.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 J. Deman, Anal. Chem, 43 (1970) 321.<br />

2 R.P. Bell, Acids and Bases, Methuen, London, 2nd ed., 1969.<br />

3 G. Schwarzenbach, Helv. Chim Acta, 13 (1930) 870.<br />

4 J. Dingemans, Electrochemie, Waltman, Delft, 5th ed., 1964.<br />

5 R.G. Bates, Electrometric pH Determinations, Wiley, New York, 1964.<br />

6 C.L. de Ligny, P.F.M. Luykx, M. Rehbach and A.A. Wieneke, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 79<br />

(1960) 699.<br />

7 C.L. de Ligny, P.F.M. Luykx, M. Rehbach and A.A. Wieneke, Rec. Trav. Chim Pays-Bas, 79<br />

(1960) 713.<br />

8 R.M. Fuoss,J. Amer. Chem. SOC., 79 (1957) 3301.<br />

9 R.M. Fuoss and L. Onsager, J. Phys. Chem., 61 (1957) 668.<br />

10 W.J. Gelsema, Thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, 1964.<br />

11 C.L. de Ligny, Thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, 1959.<br />

12 C.L. de Ligny and M. Rehbach, Rec. Trav. Chim Pays-Bas, I9 (1960) 727.<br />

13 J. Kucharsk; and L. Safarik, nitrations in Non-Aqueous Solutions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1965.<br />

14 D.B. Rorabacher, W.J. MacKellar, F.R. Shu and M. Bonavita, Anal. Chem. 43 (1971) 561.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!