26.12.2012 Views

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

i<br />

3<br />

T<br />

364 SEPARATIONS IN NON-AQUEOUS SYSTEMS<br />

- - c_<br />

t t t<br />

Fig.16.1. Isotachopherograms of the separation of dl-malic acid (A), oxalic acid (B) and a mixture of<br />

oxalic and dl-malic acids C. A: 1 = Chloride; 2 = dl-malate; and 3 = cacodylate. B: 1 = Chloride; 2,<br />

3 = components that belong to the oxalate [the oxalate (2) and possibly an ester (3)] ; 4 = cacodylate.<br />

C: 1 = Chloride; 2 = oxalate; 3 = malate; 4 = the ester of oxalate and methanol (?); 5 = cacodylate.<br />

isotachopherogram of pure dihydroxymaleic acid is given. The terminator was cacodylic<br />

acid.<br />

The substances listed in Table 16.2 are almost all organic acids; in general, inorganic<br />

acids were sparingly soluble in methanol. Because of its lower dielectric constant,<br />

complex formation occurs to a much greater extent in methanol than in water, and also<br />

the greater effect of the activity coefficients and the decreasing effect on the mobility<br />

make methanol unsuitable for isotachophoretic experiments with inorganic ionic species.<br />

For the halides, however, which have almost identical effective mobilities in water and<br />

cannot be separated, some experiments were carried out in methanol. As with alkali<br />

metals (see section 16.3.1), the halides have greater differences in mobilities in methanol<br />

and can easily be separated. In Table 16.3, the absolute ionic mobilities and measured<br />

step heights in water and methanol are given. The leading electrolyte in water was<br />

0.01 N hydrobromic acid and in methanol 0.01 N hydriodic acid. In Fig.16.3, the<br />

separation of the halides is shown, with sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate as terminator.<br />

In the sample used to obtain Fig.16.3, formate was added in order to have the possibility<br />

of comparing the step heights with those in Table 16.2.<br />

16.3. SEPARATION OF CATIONIC SPECIES IN METHANOL USING A THERMO-<br />

METRIC DETECTOR<br />

Some cationic species were measured in three different systems, viz., the unbuffered<br />

system MHCl, listed in Table 16.4, and the buffered systems MKAC and MTMAAC listed<br />

in the Tables 16.5 and 16.6 respectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!