26.12.2012 Views

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXPERIMENTS IN AQUEOUS METHANOLIC SYSTEMS 313<br />

between the various ionic species and the resolution of the thermometric detector, as<br />

discussed in Chapters 6 and 10, is low.<br />

16.3.3. The operational system MTMAAC<br />

In the preceding system, the leading ion is K’ and cationic species with mobilities<br />

less than that of K' cannot be determined. Because many ions are more mobile than K’,<br />

we carried out some experiments with the leading electrolyte tetramethylammonium<br />

acetate, the tetramethylammonium ion being the most mobile cationic species used in<br />

our experiments. In Table 16.7 it can be seen that most step heights agree with those in<br />

the system MKAC. All divalent cations are slightly slower, possibly owing to the higher pH.<br />

16.4. EXPERIMENTS IN AQUEOUS METHANOLIC SYSTEMS USING A CONDUCTI-<br />

METRIC DETECTOR (a.c. METHOD) AND UV ABSORPTION DETECTOR (256 nm)<br />

More detailed research must be carried out with methanol-water mixtures as solvents<br />

before conclusive results can be given; it is always difficult to recommend specific propor-<br />

tions of these two solvent components because they depend mainly on the substances to<br />

be analyzed. Therefore, only four experiments will be briefly discussed here, carried out<br />

in 100% water and 9: 1,4: 1 and 7:3 water-methanol mixtures. The methanol (95%,<br />

technical grade) was purified by running it through a mixed-bed ion exchanger (Merck V).<br />

Double-distilled water was applied. The experiments were carried out in the operational<br />

system at pH 5.0 (Table 11.3), except for the solvent. The current has been stabilized at<br />

70 PA, the amplifications of the conductivity detector (a.c. method) and the UV absorp-<br />

tion detector were not changed and the speed of the recorder paper was 6 cm/min for all<br />

analyses.<br />

Fig.16.9 shows the results of the analyses for 100% water and 9:1 water-methanol,<br />

and Fig.16.10 shows those for 4:1 and 7:3 water-methanol.<br />

From the isotachopherograms shown, it is clear that the effective mobilities of the<br />

various constituents of the sample are influenced in different ways. Moreover, it can be<br />

seen that the resolution of both detectors is sufficient.<br />

Fig.16.9. Isotachophoretic separation of a standard mixture of cations (Fig.ll.7) carried out in the<br />

operational system at pH 5 (Table 11.3) in (A) water and (B) 9: 1 water-methanol. 1 = K'; 2 = Ba2+;<br />

3 = Na+; 4 = (CH,),N*; 5 = PbZ+; 6 = Girard reagent D+; 7 = Tris'; 8 = histidine'; 9 = creatinine+;<br />

10 = benzidine'; 11 = e-aminocaproic acid+; 12 = y-aminobutyric acid'. The amplifications of the<br />

detectors were not changed. A = Increasing UV absorption; R = increasing resistance; t = time.<br />

Fig.16.10. Isotachophoretic separation of a standard mixture of cations (Figs.11.7 and 16.9) in<br />

water-methanol systems (A, 4:l; B, 7:3) carried out in the operational system at pH 5 (Table 11.3).<br />

A = Increasing UV absorption; R = increasing resistance; t = time.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!