26.12.2012 Views

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNTER FLOW OF ELECTROLYTE 231<br />

instances this factor may be zero or even that the separation may be positively influenced.<br />

Also, when the difference in effective mobility is minimal, one cannot expect always a<br />

complete separation because in some cases the ions have a mutual adverse influence on<br />

the pH of the mixed zone and give a poorer separation. Once the ions are separated they<br />

will form discrete zones owing to the difference in the pH values in the two zones.<br />

We found the counter flow of electrolyte to be successful especially when samples need<br />

to be separated with large concentration differences between the various zones. The<br />

use of a counter flow of electrolyte has also proved of value in elucidating whether a<br />

separation is completed or not (i.e., mixed zones are present or not).<br />

Although the use of a counter flow of electrolyte in isotachophoretic experiments<br />

can be seen to be a valuable tool, it also has disadvantages. If a counter flow of electrolyte<br />

is to be considered, the chemicals must be of the highest purity available, and even then<br />

they often are not pure enough. The impurities may sometimes be collected betwetn the<br />

leading and terminating zones and influence the analysis. Sometimes the zone still<br />

undergoes a small migration and cannot be stopped owing to impurities present. The<br />

impurities in the leading electrolyte and/or in the terminating electrolyte must be<br />

removed by recrystallization, zone refining or electrophoretic procedures, etc., if<br />

Eqn. 7.2 relates to the leading electrolyte and eqn. 7.3 to the terminating electrolyte,<br />

where meff,T, meff.,I and are the effective mobilities of the terminating ion,<br />

impurity and leading ion, respectively.<br />

7.5.2. Counter flow with level regulation<br />

Fig.7.17 shows schematically the equipment with which a counter flow of electrolyte<br />

can be applied, and the circuit for the regulation of the counter flow of electrolyte is<br />

shown in Fig.7.18.<br />

The moment at which the counter flow is to be started can be selected with the<br />

lO-kf2 potentiometer. The switch A is provided in order to have the possibility of<br />

selecting a high potential on the side of the injection block of chosen polarity. It has to<br />

be borne in mind that for optimal functioning of the conductimeter, the probe must be<br />

at a ‘low’ potential, Le., less than 10 kV. As soon as the voltage selected by the lO-kS2<br />

potentiometer has been reached, the level is controlled by the plunger (Fig.7.17) by means<br />

of a coil. Before the experiment, this level is adjusted approximately to the level in the<br />

compartment of the terminating electrolyte, such that the sample zones still migrate in the<br />

appropriate direction by means of the electric field strength (possibly a small flow in the<br />

direction of the movement of the zones is permitted). Owing to the construction of the<br />

counter electrode compartment, the pH jump across the membrane is of minor importance.<br />

Experiments with a counter flow of electrolyte showed that it is important that the<br />

compartment in which the driving electrode is mounted should contain electrolyte also.<br />

The electrolyte, containing buffer ions, decreases the potential at the measuring electrodes<br />

of the conductivity probe and diminishes the pH jump across the membrane.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!