26.12.2012 Views

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONDUCTIMETRIC MEASUREMENTS<br />

factor of 10. Other factors, e.g. , electroendosmosis and temperature profiles, place<br />

limits on the dilution of the leading electrolyte. Moreover, the pH range in which the<br />

analysis can be carried out will be considerably smaller if dilute solutions are applied.<br />

Elution effects due to OH and H’ soon appear. Also impurities, especially those<br />

present in the terminating electrolyte, may play a dominant role. For correct sampling,<br />

especially with a micro-syringe, the concentration of the terminating electrolyte must<br />

be adjusted to the low concentration of the leading electrolyte. More attention must<br />

be paid to the pH*.<br />

The detection limit can be decreased by injecting a larger sample, and a sample tap is<br />

particularly suitable for ths. Of course the availability of a counter flow of electrolyte<br />

can also decrease the detection limit.<br />

The time required for the analyses depends on the length of the narrow-bore tube<br />

needed for separation, the electric current used, the type of leading and counter io;r;s<br />

present, the pH, the differences in effective mobility of the most difficult pair of ions<br />

that need to be separated, the volume injected, the concentrations of the various sample<br />

ions, etc. The time required for the analyses discussed above was cu. 45-60 min.<br />

10.4. CONDUCTIMETRIC MEASUREMENTS<br />

10.4.1. Reproducibility<br />

Experiments are often carried out at low concentration regions in which it is impossible<br />

to use a thermometric detector. Experiments with thermometric detectors have shown,<br />

however, that the greatest reproducibility and linearity are obtained if low concentra-<br />

tions and small amounts of sample are used.<br />

For the experiments with the conductivity detector, the improved injection block<br />

(section 7.2.4) can be used and the injection of the sample made in the leading electrolyte,<br />

the terminating electrolyte or at the boundary between them. The effects of the<br />

terminators applied can be studied more precisely. The experiments showed that the<br />

best terminator is a component with a suitable pK value and that its concentration must<br />

be made as similar as possible to the adjusted concentration inside the narrow-bore tube.<br />

Also, the pH must be adjusted to an appropriate value. However, all of these precautions<br />

with respect to the terminating electrolyte need not be taken in all experiments.<br />

Not only the injection block, but also the use of a high-resolution detector improves<br />

the reproducibility. The experiments here were also carried out in the operational system<br />

at pH 6 (Table 12.1.).<br />

Again formic acid was injected ten times with glutamic acid and acetic acid as the<br />

terminators. The terminator solution was carefully prepared, the pH being adjusted to<br />

that of the leading electrolyte by addition of recrystallized Tris. The average zone length<br />

was found to be L* = 65 sec for both series of experiments, with an average deviation of<br />

0.4 sec.<br />

*An isotachopherogram of a separation at a low concentration of the leading electrolyte is shown in<br />

Chapter 6, where the thermometric detector is discussed (section 6.2.4, Fig.6.6).<br />

219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!