26.12.2012 Views

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 DETECTION SYSTEMS<br />

of consideration, especially if one is interested only in the suppression of the electro-<br />

endosmotic flow.<br />

In isotachophoretic analyses, the electroendosmotic flow is not constant in all zones,<br />

but increases in the direction of the terminating zone. Ths effect increases the turbulence<br />

of the liquid in each zone, but it is beyond the scope of this book to go into great detail.<br />

Because hydrodynamic flow in the narrow-bore tube is blocked at one side by the semi-<br />

permeable membrane, a profile as shown in Fig.6.35 may be postulated for both the<br />

electroendosmosis and the temperature differences in the various zones.<br />

There are still some differences of opinion concerning the boundary conditions for<br />

the movement of liquids, especially if this is compared with the movement of the zone<br />

boundaries. As in all types of calculation, the potential at the wall is taken determinative<br />

for the electroendosmosis. This potential is often called the { (zeta) potential. When an<br />

A B<br />

Fig.6.35. Profile of a zone boundary in a narrow-bore tube that is blocked at one side by asemipermeable<br />

membrane. The arrows indicate the movement of the zone boundary; Xindicates the direction in which<br />

the sampk zones move. In both (A) and (B), the parabolic profile due to the difference in temperature<br />

between the centre and the wall of the narrow-bore tube is in the same direction as the movement of the<br />

zone boundary (-.-.-). A correction must be made for the difference in temperature on both sides of<br />

the parabolic profile. In (A), the electroendosmotic flow is chosen to be in the same direction as the move-<br />

ment of the zone boundary, while in (B) this flow is in the opposite direction. The dotted line indicates<br />

this electroendosmotic proffle. A correction must also be made for the difference in electroendosmotic<br />

flow on both sides of the boundary, because the potential gradients in the two zones are not equal.<br />

The final profiie (hypothetical) is indicated in both (A) and (B) by a full line.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!