26.12.2012 Views

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

Frans_M_Everaerts_Isotachophoresis_378342.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

204 INSTRUMENTATION<br />

varying the concentration of the sample or by inserting a small piece of insulating material<br />

in the bore of the tap. The latter procedure is very complicated.<br />

Introduction of the sample with aid of a syringe seems to be the most commonly used<br />

technique, because the sample size can be vaned quickly and usually a smaller amount<br />

of sample is required. However, if the sample is introduced in the leading electrolyte,<br />

mixed zones can be expected between the leading ion and the fastest moving ion of the<br />

sample. If the sample is injected in the terminating electrolyte, ionic species with a low<br />

pK value (cationic separation) or a high pK value (anionic separation) can be retarded so<br />

much that considerable amounts of these ionic species can be missed or even lost.<br />

Reproducible quantitative results can hardly be expected. Particularly if experiments are<br />

carried out at low concentrations (0.001 N), special care must be taken in selecting the<br />

concentration and the pH of the terminating electrolyte. If the sample is mixed with a<br />

terminating electrolyte that has too high a concentration or an incorrect pH, both the<br />

qualitative and quantitative results will be poor. In addition, the influence of impurities<br />

in the electrolyte may play an important role, but this is not influenced by the method<br />

of sample introduction. More attention is devoted to this aspect in the Section<br />

Applications.<br />

Of course, if a syringe is used for sample introduction, some of the sample will always<br />

be mixed with the leading and terminating electrolytes if the sample is introduced at<br />

the boundary between these electrolytes, as this boundary is never well defined.<br />

7.2.2. Four-way tap<br />

The principle of the four-way tap is shown in Fig.7.1. The mechanism is shown in<br />

four alternative positions. In position 1 the narrowbore tube is rinsed and can be filed<br />

with the leading electrolyte, in position 2 the terminating electrolyte can be introduced<br />

into the reservoir for the terminating electrolyte, in position 3 the sample tap can be<br />

rinsed and filled with the sample and in position 4 the sample is sandwiched between the<br />

leading electrolyte and the terminating electrolyte. The analysis can be performed with<br />

the tap in position 4, in which case the connections must fit exactly, because no dead<br />

volumes can be allowed (gas bubbles may stick to these connections and if the dead<br />

volume is located between the narrow bore and the sample tap the time of analysis is<br />

adversely influenced). The other connections are not important in this respect, because they<br />

are used only for rinsing and filling the various compartments of the electrophoretic<br />

equipment .<br />

The tap initially applied by us was made of Pyrex glass, although any other insulating<br />

material can be used. A combination of Kel-F and Arnite can be particularly recom-<br />

mended. The average volume of the tap applied by us was 20-100 pl. The volume of the<br />

tap was sometimes changed by inserting a piece of insulating material, but this procedure<br />

proved to be very complicated if good qualitative and quantitative results were to be<br />

obtained.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!