26.12.2012 Views

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

The Role of <strong>the</strong> Argeadai in <strong>the</strong><br />

Legitimation of <strong>the</strong> Ptolemaic<br />

Dynasty<br />

Rhetoric <strong>and</strong> Practice<br />

Margarita Lianou<br />

T he dynasty of <strong>the</strong> Ptolemies proved <strong>the</strong> most enduring of all <strong>the</strong><br />

royal houses that emerged after <strong>the</strong> death of Alex<strong>and</strong>er <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong>.<br />

In this respect, it was <strong>the</strong> most successful. However, <strong>the</strong> enduring<br />

presence of Ptolemaic Egypt as a political unit in <strong>the</strong> power map of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hellenistic world was <strong>the</strong> result of factors that went beyond <strong>the</strong><br />

cohesion of its dynastic organization. 1 As a matter of fact, <strong>the</strong> very<br />

weaknesses of that organization contributed to <strong>the</strong> destabilization of<br />

<strong>the</strong> broader system of <strong>the</strong> Hellenistic world <strong>and</strong> allowed <strong>the</strong> Romans<br />

to intervene in it as early as <strong>the</strong> close of <strong>the</strong> third century B.C. 2 The<br />

struggle for power <strong>and</strong> succession among competing dynastic groups<br />

endemic to all monarchic states was exacerbated by <strong>the</strong> self-serving<br />

practices of <strong>the</strong> Romans, which played potential c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />

succession off against <strong>the</strong>ir rivals. 3 The kingdom was eventually<br />

weakened to such an extent that it was fi nally incorporated into <strong>the</strong><br />

provinces of <strong>the</strong> Roman Empire. 4<br />

In spite of <strong>the</strong> fact that similar instability had already characterized<br />

succession in <strong>the</strong> hereditary dynastic monarchy of Argead Macedonia,<br />

this still constituted <strong>the</strong> most recognizable paradigm of government<br />

for <strong>the</strong> generals who partitioned <strong>the</strong> Empire after <strong>the</strong> death of<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er. 5 Every single one from this new generation of state-<br />

builders ventured to establish <strong>the</strong>ir own dynastic monarchy with<br />

varying degrees of success. 6 The urgent circumstances, though, that<br />

brought about <strong>the</strong>ir assumption of satrapal power, followed by <strong>the</strong><br />

endorsement of a royal title, entailed a radical break from <strong>the</strong> established<br />

royal Macedonian tradition. None of <strong>the</strong>se military men, who<br />

became kings over portions of Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s former empire, were rightful<br />

members of <strong>the</strong> Argead dynasty. 7 The monarchy was a central institution<br />

in Macedonia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> dynasty was <strong>the</strong> center of that monarchy.<br />

In almost four hundred years of recorded Macedonian history, up<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!