26.12.2012 Views

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36 FATHER, SON, AND COURT<br />

Figure 4.2. Pedestal of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philip</strong>peum group. Olympia, Archaeological<br />

Museum. Photo: Olga Palagia.<br />

life she assumed different names, but <strong>the</strong> name Olympias is sometimes<br />

associated with <strong>Philip</strong>’s fi rst Olympic victory in 356, <strong>the</strong> year of<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s birth. Ernst Badian has made <strong>the</strong> cautionary remark that<br />

despite all her name changes, Olympias did not assume <strong>the</strong> name<br />

Eurydice, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore it could not have functioned as a regnal name<br />

in Macedonia. 12 In addition, Antipater named one of his daughters<br />

Eurydice without arousing suspicion that she aspired to royalty.<br />

If we look at <strong>the</strong> various emendations to <strong>the</strong> text of Pausanias proposed<br />

since <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century, we observe that Corais’ noncommittal<br />

E ὐρυδίκη τε ἡ Φιλίππου < καὶ Ὀλυμπιάς > (“<strong>Philip</strong>’s Eurydice<br />

<strong>and</strong> Olympias”) is unhelpful because it implies that <strong>Philip</strong> had a<br />

daughter named Eurydice, which we know to be untrue. Buttmann’s<br />

emendation E ὐρυδίκη τε ἡ < Ἀριδαίου γυνὴ καὶ Ὀλυμπιὰς ἡ>; Φιλίππου<br />

(“Eurydice, Arrhidaeus’ wife <strong>and</strong> Olympias, <strong>Philip</strong>’s wife”) adding<br />

Adea Eurydice to <strong>the</strong> family group is impossible if we recall that Adea<br />

was born around <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philip</strong>peum 13 <strong>and</strong><br />

that <strong>Philip</strong> had no room for her in his dynastic plans. The last two<br />

emendations by Rocha Pereira (E ὐρυδίκη τε ἡ Φιλίππου < μήτηρ καὶ<br />

Ὀλυμπιὰς ἡ γυνὴ αὐτοῦ >: “Eurydice, <strong>Philip</strong>’s mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Olympias,<br />

his wife”) <strong>and</strong> Cassevitz (E ὐρυδίκη τε ἡ < μήτηρ καὶ Ὀλυμπιὰς ἡ ><br />

Φιλίππου < γυνή >: “Eurydice, <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> Olympias, <strong>the</strong> wife of<br />

<strong>Philip</strong>”) advocate <strong>the</strong> inclusion of <strong>Philip</strong>’s mo<strong>the</strong>r Eurydice as a companion<br />

to his fa<strong>the</strong>r Amyntas, forming a pendant to <strong>Philip</strong>’s wife<br />

Olympias. And yet this reconstruction of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philip</strong>peum statuary<br />

group does not refl ect <strong>the</strong> realities of <strong>the</strong> fi nal years of <strong>Philip</strong>’s life. It<br />

is a construct of modern scholarship blinkered by hindsight. The<br />

great historical signifi cance of Alex<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> Olympias has colored<br />

modern perception of <strong>the</strong> monument.<br />

<strong>Philip</strong>’s fa<strong>the</strong>r, Amyntas <strong>II</strong>I, reigned from 393 to 370/69, <strong>and</strong> was<br />

succeeded by his son, Alex<strong>and</strong>er <strong>II</strong>, who sat on <strong>the</strong> throne until 367,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!