26.12.2012 Views

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

91–92.<br />

Chapter 15<br />

NOTES TO PAGES 163–167 289<br />

1. All translations of Justin are from Develin <strong>and</strong> Heckel 1994:<br />

2. On <strong>Philip</strong>, see now Worthington 2008. Also on <strong>Philip</strong>, though get-<br />

ting on in years, are Ellis 1976, Cawkwell 1978, Hammond 1994, <strong>and</strong><br />

Hammond <strong>and</strong> Griffi th, 1979: 203–698.<br />

3. The number of books on Alex<strong>and</strong>er is enormous, <strong>and</strong> Alex<strong>and</strong>er<br />

can be lauded or condemned depending on <strong>the</strong> perspective of <strong>the</strong> author.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> more recent biographies may be singled out Green 1974, Hammond<br />

1989b, Hammond 1997, Cartledge 2003, <strong>and</strong> Worthington 2004.<br />

The best scholarly biography is still Bosworth 1988a, <strong>and</strong> see also Bosworth<br />

1996. For more bibliography <strong>and</strong> discussion, see <strong>the</strong> bibliographic<br />

essays at Cartledge 2003: 327–47 <strong>and</strong> Worthington 2004: 320–332.<br />

4. See below on <strong>the</strong> date of Justin.<br />

5. There is no need to rehearse <strong>the</strong> details of <strong>the</strong>se two kings’ reigns<br />

or to give copious references to all points in this essay: for <strong>the</strong>se, any of<br />

<strong>the</strong> modern books cited in notes 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 (which quote fur<strong>the</strong>r bibliography)<br />

may be consulted.<br />

6. On <strong>the</strong> cultural <strong>and</strong> political signifi cance of Alex<strong>and</strong>er for Rome,<br />

how he may have been shaped by Roman political <strong>and</strong> cultural life, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se effects on writers of <strong>the</strong> time, see Spencer 2002. The best discussion<br />

of <strong>the</strong> problems of <strong>the</strong> sources for Alex<strong>and</strong>er is Bosworth 1988b, <strong>and</strong> on<br />

this issue see fur<strong>the</strong>r below.<br />

7. On <strong>the</strong> relationship of Justin’s work to <strong>the</strong> original work by Trogus,<br />

see Yardley 2003; cf. Hammond 1991.<br />

8. See fur<strong>the</strong>r, Syme 1988 (arguing for <strong>the</strong> late date).<br />

9. Spencer 2002: 37; see also Alonso-Nú ñez 1987.<br />

10. Diod. 17.79–80, Arr. 3.26, Curt. 6.7–7.2, Plut. Alex. 48.1–49, Justin<br />

12.5.1–8; cf. Bosworth 1988a: 100–04, Worthington 2004: 120–24.<br />

11. Arr. 4.13.4, Curt. 8.6.11, Plut. Alex. 55.9; cf. Bosworth 1988a:<br />

117–19, Worthington, 2004: 141–43. On <strong>the</strong> conspiracies, see Badian 2000.<br />

12. Diod. 17.94.4, Arr. 5.25.2–29, Curt. 9.2.10–3.19, Plut. Alex. 62.1–3,<br />

Justin 12.8.10; cf. Bosworth 1988a: 132–34, Worthington 2004: 158–61<br />

<strong>and</strong> 208–09.<br />

13. Arr. 4.8.8, Curt. 8.1.29–51, Plut. Alex. 51.8; cf. Bosworth 1988a:<br />

114–16, Worthington, 2004: 136–38.<br />

14. See Bosworth 1988a: 171–73, Worthington 2004: 266–68; on <strong>the</strong><br />

fabrications surrounding Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s death, see Bosworth 1971.<br />

15. See Worthington 2008: 181–86, citing bibliography.<br />

16. Currently collected toge<strong>the</strong>r in Jacoby, FGrH <strong>II</strong>B, nos. 117–53, with<br />

a German commentary in <strong>II</strong>D at pp. 403–542. (A completely new edition of<br />

FGrH is in progress, entitled Brill’s New Jacoby, publication of which will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!