Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua
Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua
Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
91–92.<br />
Chapter 15<br />
NOTES TO PAGES 163–167 289<br />
1. All translations of Justin are from Develin <strong>and</strong> Heckel 1994:<br />
2. On <strong>Philip</strong>, see now Worthington 2008. Also on <strong>Philip</strong>, though get-<br />
ting on in years, are Ellis 1976, Cawkwell 1978, Hammond 1994, <strong>and</strong><br />
Hammond <strong>and</strong> Griffi th, 1979: 203–698.<br />
3. The number of books on Alex<strong>and</strong>er is enormous, <strong>and</strong> Alex<strong>and</strong>er<br />
can be lauded or condemned depending on <strong>the</strong> perspective of <strong>the</strong> author.<br />
Among <strong>the</strong> more recent biographies may be singled out Green 1974, Hammond<br />
1989b, Hammond 1997, Cartledge 2003, <strong>and</strong> Worthington 2004.<br />
The best scholarly biography is still Bosworth 1988a, <strong>and</strong> see also Bosworth<br />
1996. For more bibliography <strong>and</strong> discussion, see <strong>the</strong> bibliographic<br />
essays at Cartledge 2003: 327–47 <strong>and</strong> Worthington 2004: 320–332.<br />
4. See below on <strong>the</strong> date of Justin.<br />
5. There is no need to rehearse <strong>the</strong> details of <strong>the</strong>se two kings’ reigns<br />
or to give copious references to all points in this essay: for <strong>the</strong>se, any of<br />
<strong>the</strong> modern books cited in notes 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 (which quote fur<strong>the</strong>r bibliography)<br />
may be consulted.<br />
6. On <strong>the</strong> cultural <strong>and</strong> political signifi cance of Alex<strong>and</strong>er for Rome,<br />
how he may have been shaped by Roman political <strong>and</strong> cultural life, <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se effects on writers of <strong>the</strong> time, see Spencer 2002. The best discussion<br />
of <strong>the</strong> problems of <strong>the</strong> sources for Alex<strong>and</strong>er is Bosworth 1988b, <strong>and</strong> on<br />
this issue see fur<strong>the</strong>r below.<br />
7. On <strong>the</strong> relationship of Justin’s work to <strong>the</strong> original work by Trogus,<br />
see Yardley 2003; cf. Hammond 1991.<br />
8. See fur<strong>the</strong>r, Syme 1988 (arguing for <strong>the</strong> late date).<br />
9. Spencer 2002: 37; see also Alonso-Nú ñez 1987.<br />
10. Diod. 17.79–80, Arr. 3.26, Curt. 6.7–7.2, Plut. Alex. 48.1–49, Justin<br />
12.5.1–8; cf. Bosworth 1988a: 100–04, Worthington 2004: 120–24.<br />
11. Arr. 4.13.4, Curt. 8.6.11, Plut. Alex. 55.9; cf. Bosworth 1988a:<br />
117–19, Worthington, 2004: 141–43. On <strong>the</strong> conspiracies, see Badian 2000.<br />
12. Diod. 17.94.4, Arr. 5.25.2–29, Curt. 9.2.10–3.19, Plut. Alex. 62.1–3,<br />
Justin 12.8.10; cf. Bosworth 1988a: 132–34, Worthington 2004: 158–61<br />
<strong>and</strong> 208–09.<br />
13. Arr. 4.8.8, Curt. 8.1.29–51, Plut. Alex. 51.8; cf. Bosworth 1988a:<br />
114–16, Worthington, 2004: 136–38.<br />
14. See Bosworth 1988a: 171–73, Worthington 2004: 266–68; on <strong>the</strong><br />
fabrications surrounding Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s death, see Bosworth 1971.<br />
15. See Worthington 2008: 181–86, citing bibliography.<br />
16. Currently collected toge<strong>the</strong>r in Jacoby, FGrH <strong>II</strong>B, nos. 117–53, with<br />
a German commentary in <strong>II</strong>D at pp. 403–542. (A completely new edition of<br />
FGrH is in progress, entitled Brill’s New Jacoby, publication of which will