26.12.2012 Views

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

19<br />

“And Your Fa<strong>the</strong>r Sees You”<br />

Paternity in Alex<strong>and</strong>er (2004)<br />

Gideon Nisbet<br />

Pay attention, lad. Your fa<strong>the</strong>r still watches over you.<br />

—Cleitus at Gaugamela, Alex<strong>and</strong>er (2004)<br />

What a great story. Why hasn’t it been told?<br />

—Oliver Stone, Resurrecting Alex<strong>and</strong>er (DVD feature)<br />

Introduction: Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s Paternity<br />

T his chapter explores <strong>the</strong> narrative functions of <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />

between fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> son in Oliver Stone’s recent epic fi lm,<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er (2004). I limit my remarks to <strong>the</strong> cinematic release, ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than <strong>the</strong> director’s two extended <strong>and</strong> revised versions (thus far) on<br />

DVD, <strong>the</strong> Director’s (2005) <strong>and</strong> Final (2007) Cuts—<strong>the</strong> latter also<br />

known as Alex<strong>and</strong>er Revisited. These attempts to reposition Alex<strong>and</strong>er<br />

as a neglected modern classic refl ect Stone’s own carefully publicized<br />

identifi cation with <strong>the</strong> hero’s character arc, but were even more poorly<br />

received by critics <strong>and</strong> audiences than <strong>the</strong> version originally released<br />

in cinemas worldwide in 2004 <strong>and</strong> written off at <strong>the</strong> time as “Olly’s<br />

Folly.” This chapter does not address <strong>the</strong> reception of Stone’s fi lm in<br />

fan <strong>and</strong> critical discourse (a potentially rich topic), <strong>and</strong> is not concerned<br />

with developing a critical account of its fl aws as a piece of<br />

cinema. Nor does it set out to recuperate Alex<strong>and</strong>er by arguing that it<br />

has been misunderstood or unjustly maligned, along <strong>the</strong> lines<br />

attempted by Martin Winkler <strong>and</strong> his academic collaborators in<br />

defense of Wolfgang Petersen’s Troy (2004), ano<strong>the</strong>r recent classical<br />

epic poorly received by critics on its release. Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s cinematic<br />

shortcomings <strong>and</strong> postrelease misfortunes have been addressed elsewhere,<br />

by me among o<strong>the</strong>rs. 1<br />

It is certainly <strong>the</strong> case that more exciting things could have been<br />

done with Alex<strong>and</strong>er’s story. A proposed version by Moulin Rouge<br />

director Baz Luhrmann starring Leonardo DiCaprio is merely <strong>the</strong><br />

most famous of numerous, ultimately unsuccessful rival fi lm projects<br />

of <strong>the</strong> late 1990s <strong>and</strong> early 2000s. Indeed, for several years <strong>the</strong><br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!