31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

curtail an avenue of approach for <strong>the</strong>m ra<strong>the</strong>r than as an attack on <strong>the</strong> Arians<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves.<br />

Of course Athanasius would tend to portray Jovian as sympa<strong>the</strong>tic to <strong>the</strong><br />

Nicene cause, but despite this it does seem fairly certa<strong>in</strong> that Jovian had no desire to be<br />

drawn <strong>in</strong>to ecclesiastical politics so early <strong>in</strong> his reign. Only with <strong>the</strong> persistence of <strong>the</strong><br />

Arian petitioners, and at <strong>the</strong>ir third attempt, was Jovian obliged to <strong>in</strong>volve himself <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> affair and that obligation may have been due to <strong>the</strong> apparent circumstances of <strong>the</strong><br />

third petition <strong>in</strong> that Jovian appears to have been sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> his judicial capacity<br />

expect<strong>in</strong>g petitions from <strong>the</strong> crowd who <strong>in</strong> turn expected a response and <strong>the</strong>refore he<br />

could not avoid <strong>the</strong> situation. When he f<strong>in</strong>ally did give some <strong>in</strong>dication of his<br />

position, he reversed <strong>the</strong> policy of both his predecessors and restored Athanasius to <strong>the</strong><br />

see of Alexandria. This seems counter-<strong>in</strong>tuitive. In light of <strong>the</strong> recent defeats <strong>in</strong>flicted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Persians and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> withdrawal from Mesopotamia, it may have been<br />

reasonable to expect Jovian to have cont<strong>in</strong>ued with <strong>the</strong> policies of his Christian<br />

predecessor Constantius, at least until he felt himself secure enough <strong>in</strong> his new position<br />

to push forward his own religious policy. Lenski suggests that <strong>the</strong> restoration of<br />

Athanasius was <strong>in</strong> practice unavoidable as he had now become “an icon of orthodoxy<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> west.” 5 Socrates however has a reveal<strong>in</strong>g quote from <strong>the</strong> emperor <strong>in</strong> which<br />

Jovian is reported as say<strong>in</strong>g that he “would not molest any one on account of his<br />

religious sentiments, and that he should love and highly esteem such as would<br />

zealously promote <strong>the</strong> unity of <strong>the</strong> church.” 6 As such, Jovian may have been less<br />

<strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed with doctr<strong>in</strong>al questions and hence more <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to tolerate Athanasius for<br />

<strong>the</strong> sake of unity and peace, ra<strong>the</strong>r than because he necessarily agreed with <strong>the</strong> bishop.<br />

The Ecclesiastical historians however are keen to present Jovian as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ctive Orthodox Christian. Socrates records that he had long considered himself a<br />

Nicene ra<strong>the</strong>r than anyth<strong>in</strong>g else and also records that on his accession he recalled all<br />

5 Lenski (2002) 238<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!