31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cont<strong>in</strong>ents” from visit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> homes of “widows and female wards.” 50 By us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

term ecclesiasticus, <strong>the</strong> law extended <strong>the</strong> prohibition to <strong>the</strong> widest possible extent by<br />

potentially <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all persons attached to <strong>the</strong> Church ra<strong>the</strong>r than just to clerici. 51<br />

Ecclesiastics who violated this law were to be tried by <strong>the</strong> “public judges”, 52 that is to<br />

say <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> civil courts. As bishops were also ecclesiastics, this law would appear to be a<br />

partial repeal of Constantius’ CTh 16.2.12 of October 355 which gave Bishops <strong>the</strong><br />

right of be<strong>in</strong>g tried only <strong>in</strong> courts consist<strong>in</strong>g of fellow Bishops. This law of<br />

Valent<strong>in</strong>ian had been comprehensively thought out and aimed to prohibit any means<br />

through which clerics could acquire any benefit from such women ei<strong>the</strong>r dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

lifetimes or after <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir wills, and even through <strong>the</strong> agency of a third party.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, if such women did give or bequeath anyth<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ecclesiastics, <strong>the</strong>n it<br />

would be confiscated to <strong>the</strong> treasury. Only ecclesiastics who were relatives of <strong>the</strong><br />

women would be able to <strong>in</strong>herit anyth<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Although it may seem curious that a piece of legislation which was directed<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong> Church and its members was addressed to <strong>the</strong> Bishop of<br />

Rome, <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>the</strong> force of <strong>the</strong> law was almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly be<strong>in</strong>g directed aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

Damasus personally. He had acquired a reputation for frequent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> homes of older<br />

elite women and was ridiculed as “<strong>the</strong> matrons’ ear tickler.” 53 This law may also be<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicative of a distaste which Valent<strong>in</strong>ian felt for <strong>the</strong> urban clergy and <strong>the</strong> conflict <strong>in</strong><br />

366/7 between Damasus and Urs<strong>in</strong>us over <strong>the</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> pontificate which left 137 dead<br />

<strong>in</strong> one day. Therefore this law may have been an attempt to prevent <strong>the</strong> accumulation<br />

of wealth by <strong>the</strong> Church which was thought to <strong>in</strong>spire this sort of violence.<br />

Valent<strong>in</strong>ian would not have been alone <strong>in</strong> this criticism of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> bishop;<br />

Praetextatus apparently joked with Damasus that he would become a Christian<br />

49<br />

Q. Clodius Hermogenianus Olybrius 3 PLRE 1.640-642<br />

50<br />

Ecclesiastici aut ex ecclesiasticis v el qui cont<strong>in</strong>entium se v olunt nom <strong>in</strong>e nuncupari, v iduarum ac pupillarum<br />

dom os non adeant. Pharr translates cont<strong>in</strong>entium as “Cont<strong>in</strong>ents” but perhaps it is more accurate, but<br />

clumsy, to translate cont<strong>in</strong>entium as ‘those who wish to be chaste.’<br />

51<br />

As CTh 12.1.59 did n<strong>in</strong>e years earlier<br />

52<br />

publicis…iudiciis<br />

53<br />

CSEL 35.1.10 m atronarum auriscalpius; Kahlos (1997) 35-54<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!