31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

taxation. However, if <strong>the</strong> law was <strong>in</strong>tended to be ma<strong>in</strong>ly for <strong>the</strong> benefit of <strong>the</strong> lay<br />

workers, who were of low social and economic means, <strong>the</strong>n it was not particularly<br />

generous s<strong>in</strong>ce such people would have had little to contribute to <strong>the</strong> treasury; if so,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n it would have been of more symbolic, than practical, importance.<br />

It should be noted however, that exemptions generally were not just granted to<br />

<strong>the</strong> clergy; secular professionals also enjoyed immunity. Constant<strong>in</strong>e had exempted<br />

soldiers, veterans and <strong>the</strong> close relatives of both from capitatio <strong>in</strong> his CTh. 7.20.4 of 17<br />

June 325 38 and Valent<strong>in</strong>ian confirmed <strong>the</strong> exemption <strong>in</strong> his CTh. 7.13.6 of 18<br />

September 370. Moreover, whole classes of people were permanently exempt from <strong>the</strong><br />

capitatio. It was a rural tax and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> urban plebs throughout <strong>the</strong> empire were<br />

exempt; Valent<strong>in</strong>ian had exempted all <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Illyricum <strong>in</strong> 371. 39 At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, abolition of <strong>the</strong> tax appears to have been a recognised means of court<strong>in</strong>g<br />

popularity; Constant<strong>in</strong>e II appears to have abolished capitatio at some time before he<br />

lost his dom<strong>in</strong>ions. 40<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, a sympa<strong>the</strong>tic reader of <strong>the</strong> law could well have <strong>in</strong>terpreted it to<br />

refer to pagans and conceivably even to Jews as well. They are not excluded by <strong>the</strong><br />

law and if Theodosius had <strong>in</strong>tended to <strong>in</strong>clude only Christian clerics and exclude those<br />

of o<strong>the</strong>r religions, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re seems no reason why he could not have simply said so.<br />

Such ambiguity was probably not an accident.<br />

CTh. 11.39.8 of 29 June 381 is an example of a law issued for a specific and<br />

occasional reason and is, unusually, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of a transcript purportedly record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Theodosius' actual words dur<strong>in</strong>g a meet<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> consistory. It is almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

related to <strong>the</strong> recent ecumenical Council of Constant<strong>in</strong>ople which had just ended. The<br />

38 Constant<strong>in</strong>e appears to have exempted troops even earlier <strong>in</strong> 311, see Jones (1964) 617.<br />

39 On urban plebs see Goffart (1974) 46, 48-49; for Illyricum see Jones (1964) 147-148 cit<strong>in</strong>g CJ 11.53.1<br />

40 CTh. 11.12.1 of 29 April 340; see also Goffart (1974) for Maxim<strong>in</strong>us Daja’s <strong>in</strong>tention to abolish <strong>the</strong> tax<br />

<strong>in</strong> Bithynia.<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!