31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

giv<strong>in</strong>g symbolic privilege to Christians, <strong>the</strong> emperor appears to have made, and to have<br />

been obliged to make, <strong>the</strong> right impression; <strong>the</strong> result of which is that on occasions he<br />

did appear (because he was obliged to appear) more <strong>in</strong>tolerant, but <strong>in</strong> practice and<br />

more importantly, <strong>the</strong> action did not met <strong>the</strong> rhetoric.<br />

The only law he passed aga<strong>in</strong>st paganism was severe and <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>the</strong> severest of<br />

all his laws on religious affairs (CTh. 16.1.1), but it dealt with only one small aspect of<br />

paganism and its severity is probably due to <strong>the</strong> uniquely dangerous situation that his<br />

new dynasty was <strong>in</strong> at <strong>the</strong> time. O<strong>the</strong>rwise it appears that he may well have legislated<br />

(9.16.9) to preserve aspects of paganism that had long been thought to be acceptable<br />

and similar evidence emerges from <strong>the</strong> law to Eu<strong>the</strong>rius (CIL 6.31982). On heretics his<br />

legislation was more concerned with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution of <strong>the</strong> heresies than with <strong>the</strong><br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary followers (CTh. 16.5.3 and 16.6.1).<br />

facultas trubuta est.<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!