31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Florus, <strong>the</strong> Praetorian Prefect of <strong>the</strong> East. 296 Unusually, this law came from, and was<br />

issued by <strong>the</strong> authority, of <strong>the</strong> Imperial consistory, referred to <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> law as <strong>the</strong> “public<br />

council,” although, as normal, Theodosius appears to be speak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second person<br />

plural throughout. The law ordered that “<strong>the</strong> temple shall cont<strong>in</strong>ually be open that<br />

was formerly dedicated to <strong>the</strong> assemblage of throngs of people and now also is for <strong>the</strong><br />

common use of <strong>the</strong> people.” The law went on to state that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> temple “images are<br />

reported to have been placed which must be measured by <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong>ir art ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than by <strong>the</strong>ir div<strong>in</strong>ity.” Theodosius would not permit any “Imperial response that was<br />

surreptitiously obta<strong>in</strong>ed to prejudice this situation.” Moreover, <strong>in</strong> order that <strong>the</strong><br />

temple should be seen by “assemblages of <strong>the</strong> city and by frequent crowds” Palladius<br />

was ordered to “preserve all celebrations of festivities, and by <strong>the</strong> authority of our<br />

div<strong>in</strong>e Imperial response, you shall permit <strong>the</strong> temple to be open.” But this was to<br />

happen is such a way “that <strong>the</strong> performance of sacrifices forbidden <strong>the</strong>re<strong>in</strong> may not<br />

suppose to be permitted under <strong>the</strong> pretext of such access to <strong>the</strong> temple.” 297<br />

The law <strong>the</strong>refore was only applicable to one temple, possibly <strong>in</strong> Edessa, 298 but<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are two dist<strong>in</strong>ct clauses to it. The first appears to order <strong>the</strong> conversion of <strong>the</strong><br />

temple from a strictly religious build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to someth<strong>in</strong>g approach<strong>in</strong>g a ‘community<br />

centre’ for “<strong>the</strong> common use of <strong>the</strong> people” which presumably referred to all people of<br />

whatever religion and <strong>in</strong> contrast, presumably, to <strong>the</strong> previous “assemblage of throngs<br />

of people,” which must refer to previous pagan ceremonies. The purposes of this seem<br />

to have been to convert <strong>the</strong> temple, and <strong>the</strong> images, <strong>in</strong>to some sort of art museum, for<br />

<strong>the</strong> general benefit of all. However, <strong>the</strong> second clause of <strong>the</strong> law preserves someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>the</strong> temple’s orig<strong>in</strong>al, civic and religious purpose, and ordered Palladius to actively<br />

296 Palladius 11 PLRE 1.660 of whom noth<strong>in</strong>g more is known.<br />

297 Aedem olim frequentiae dedicatam coetui et iam populo quoque com m unem , <strong>in</strong> qua sim ulacra feruntur<br />

posita artis pretio quam div <strong>in</strong>itate m etienda iugiter patere publici consilii auctoritate decernim us neque huic<br />

rei obretiv um officere s<strong>in</strong>im us oraculum . Ut conv entu urbis et frequenti coetu v ideatur, experien tia tua om ni<br />

v otorum celebritate serv ata auctoritate nostir ita patere tem plum perm ittat oraculi, ne illic prohibitorum usus<br />

sacrificiorum huius occasione aditus perm ussus esse credatur.<br />

298 Pharr (1952) 473 n17<br />

267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!