31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>in</strong>correctly assumed that <strong>the</strong> Apostate would only have co-religionists <strong>in</strong> his entourage.<br />

Eutropius did give a favourable, but measured account of Julian’s reign; he praised him<br />

for his education, his treatment of <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cials and for not be<strong>in</strong>g avaricious. 32<br />

However Eutropius criticised him for not be<strong>in</strong>g discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g enough towards his<br />

friends and also records that “he persecuted <strong>the</strong> Christian religion too much, but<br />

never<strong>the</strong>less <strong>in</strong> such a manner that he absta<strong>in</strong>ed from bloodshed.” 33<br />

Speculatively it could be suggested that if Eutropius had been a Christian <strong>the</strong>n<br />

he might have been more likely to refer to Christianity as ‘our religion,’ or <strong>in</strong> a similar<br />

manner. Equally however, Eutropius gives no positive <strong>in</strong>dication that he held pagan<br />

beliefs ei<strong>the</strong>r. Never<strong>the</strong>less, on o<strong>the</strong>r subjects Eutropius has shown himself to be<br />

partisan if he wished. Bird has argued that as a member of <strong>the</strong> senatorial elite<br />

Eutropius was keen to demonstrate <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> Senate. As such he has a<br />

bias towards Sulla and aga<strong>in</strong>st Marius and Caesar, and never even mentions <strong>the</strong><br />

Gracchi. In his treatment of <strong>the</strong> emperors <strong>the</strong> best emperors are those who respected<br />

<strong>the</strong> Senate, especially Trajan, and <strong>the</strong> worst were those who abused or ignored it. 34 If a<br />

public display of <strong>the</strong> merits of his religion had mattered as much to Eutropius as his<br />

concern for demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> Senate as well as <strong>the</strong> necessity of <strong>the</strong><br />

state hav<strong>in</strong>g ‘good’ emperors, <strong>the</strong>n we should expect to f<strong>in</strong>d evidence of such religious<br />

concern <strong>in</strong> his Breviarium. In short, s<strong>in</strong>ce we do not have any <strong>in</strong>dication of even a<br />

moderate religious agenda from Eutropius <strong>in</strong> his Breviarum, we should not expect to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d such <strong>in</strong> any of his legislation.<br />

Therefore <strong>the</strong> apparent exclusion from <strong>the</strong> amnesty of persons await<strong>in</strong>g trial, <strong>in</strong><br />

contrast to previous amnesties, cannot be attributed to any anti-Christian or pro-pagan<br />

sentiments from Eutropius. Conceivably, if Eutropius was a pagan, Theodosius may<br />

32<br />

Eutr. 10.14-10.15.1 on Julian’s campaigns as Caesar <strong>in</strong> Gaul and his accession and 10.16 for his<br />

character.<br />

33<br />

Eutr. 10.16.3 religionis Christian ae nim ius <strong>in</strong> sectator, per<strong>in</strong>de tam en, ut cruore abst<strong>in</strong>eret<br />

34 Bird (1993) xxv-xxxv<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!