31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The law “condemn[ed] <strong>the</strong> false doctr<strong>in</strong>e of those persons who trample under<br />

foot <strong>the</strong> precepts of <strong>the</strong> Apostles and who do not purify, but defile by a second<br />

baptism.” Such “pollutes” those who receive it. Flavianus is <strong>the</strong>refore ordered to<br />

make <strong>the</strong>m “desist from <strong>the</strong>ir miserable false doctr<strong>in</strong>es” and to return <strong>the</strong> churches that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have occupied to <strong>the</strong> Catholics. Only <strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>gs of those clerics who “have<br />

approved <strong>the</strong> Apostolic faith” and did not repeat baptism were to be followed. 260 The<br />

law <strong>the</strong>n prescribed what should be taught and as such is highly rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of<br />

Theodosius’ later and more famous Cun ctos Populos law (CTh. 16.1.2) of 380. Gratian<br />

stated: “For it is our will that noth<strong>in</strong>g shall be taught except what <strong>the</strong> uncorrupted<br />

faith and tradition of <strong>the</strong> Evangelists and Apostles have preserved, just as <strong>the</strong> imperial<br />

law of our fa<strong>the</strong>rs Constant<strong>in</strong>e, Constantius and Valent<strong>in</strong>ian have decreed.” 261<br />

Noticeably, “our fa<strong>the</strong>rs” was a selective list and <strong>in</strong> particular did not <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> still<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g, but Arian <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed Valens. Whichever member of Gratian’s government who<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded this clause evidently knew his religious history and was committed to <strong>the</strong><br />

Nicene version of Christianity. Presumably, <strong>the</strong> western government was also not<br />

averse to imply<strong>in</strong>g that Valens’ religious position was not necessarily correct.<br />

It is not clear which “imperial law” or laws this particular law is <strong>in</strong>vok<strong>in</strong>g. It is<br />

probably not referr<strong>in</strong>g to any particular law, but ra<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> general and perceived<br />

attitude that <strong>the</strong> emperors listed were all Nicenes. The uncerta<strong>in</strong> religious position of<br />

Constantius had evidently been forgotten and replaced with one more accommodat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to that of <strong>the</strong> present regime. Such a ‘re<strong>in</strong>terpretation,’ (or at least that is how it<br />

appears to us, based on a possibly <strong>in</strong>complete record,) would have been aided by <strong>the</strong><br />

259 Virius Nicomachus Flavianus 15 PLRE 1.347-349<br />

260 eorum condem nam us errorem , qui apostolorum praecepta calcantes Christiani nim <strong>in</strong>is sacram en ta sortitos<br />

alio rursus baptism ate n on purificant, sed <strong>in</strong>cestant, lav acri nom <strong>in</strong>e polluentes. Eos igitur auctoritas tua<br />

erroribus m iseris iubebit absistere ecclesiis, quas contra fidem ret<strong>in</strong>ent, restitutis catholicae.<br />

261 nihil enim aliud praecipi v olum us, quam quod ev angeliorum et apostolorum fides et traditio <strong>in</strong>corrupta<br />

serv av it, sicut lege div ali parentum nostrorum Constant<strong>in</strong> i Constanti Valent<strong>in</strong>iani decreta sunt.<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!