31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pronounced Caecilian’s good name to be upheld and that he should cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> his<br />

see. 45<br />

The Donatists however refused to accept <strong>the</strong> decision of <strong>the</strong> council; apparently<br />

because Caecilian had already been condemned by a council of Numidian Bishops <strong>in</strong><br />

early 312 and <strong>the</strong>refore by weight of numbers (seventy Numidians had condemned<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteen Gallic and Italian Bishops who acquitted) <strong>the</strong> decision of <strong>the</strong> larger<br />

council should take precedence over that of <strong>the</strong> smaller. 46 As such <strong>the</strong> Donatists<br />

appealed; a decision that displeased Constant<strong>in</strong>e. However, <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> emperor’s<br />

displeasure was not religious, but ra<strong>the</strong>r that <strong>the</strong> bounds of propriety <strong>in</strong> behaviour had<br />

been breached. Constant<strong>in</strong>e appears to have been quite saddened that a Bishop should<br />

have sunk to such depths that he would consider an appeal: “Just as if this were a<br />

common case of hea<strong>the</strong>n litigation, a bishop thought it proper to appeal.” 47 Despite<br />

this however, Constant<strong>in</strong>e ordered <strong>the</strong> secular authorities of North Africa to conduct<br />

an enquiry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> behaviour of Felix of Apthungi to determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r he was<br />

<strong>in</strong>deed a traditor and hence whe<strong>the</strong>r Caecilian’s enthronement was <strong>in</strong>valid. The<br />

enquiry, f<strong>in</strong>ished its proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> late 314 or early 315 and found no evidence that<br />

Felix had surrendered any scriptures. 48 Constant<strong>in</strong>e also heeded <strong>the</strong> concerns of <strong>the</strong><br />

Donatists and ordered ano<strong>the</strong>r council to be held, <strong>in</strong> August 314 at Arles, <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

attempt a conclusion to <strong>the</strong> controversy.<br />

Two letters of Constant<strong>in</strong>e announc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Arles council survive. Both must<br />

have been written at almost <strong>the</strong> same time, i.e. Spr<strong>in</strong>g 314. One was to Chrestus,<br />

bishop of Syracuse 49 and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r was to <strong>the</strong> Vicar of North Africa Aelafius. 50 From<br />

<strong>the</strong>se letters onwards it appears that Constant<strong>in</strong>e was concerned to emphasise his<br />

personal <strong>in</strong>volvement and that is shown by <strong>the</strong> knowledge he displays of what had<br />

45<br />

Opt. 1.24 Ziwsa 27 quod confessus sit se rebaptizasse et episcopis lapsis m anum <strong>in</strong>posuisse, quod ab ecclesia<br />

alienum est Edwards 24<br />

46<br />

Aug. Ep. 43.5.14-15<br />

47<br />

Opt. 1.25 Ziwsa 27; sicut <strong>in</strong> causis gentilium fieri solet, appellandum episcopus credidit<br />

48<br />

Opt. App. 2; Ziwsa 197-204; Edwards 170-180<br />

49<br />

Eus. HE. 10.5.21-24; Maier (1987) 158-160; Corcoran (2000) 304;<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!