31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4: Theodosius 379-395<br />

The death of Valens and his officers, as well as <strong>the</strong> near total destruction of <strong>the</strong><br />

eastern army at Adrianople on 9 August 378 obliged <strong>the</strong> surviv<strong>in</strong>g regime to f<strong>in</strong>d a<br />

replacement from sources that <strong>the</strong>y may not have o<strong>the</strong>rwise considered. They chose<br />

Flavius Theodosius, son of <strong>the</strong> more famous and successful general of <strong>the</strong> same name<br />

who had been quietly liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce his fa<strong>the</strong>r’s execution <strong>in</strong> 375. 1<br />

Theodosius had a reasonably long reign of almost exactly sixteen years, but<br />

until <strong>the</strong> last two and a half years, when he became sole Augustus, he was <strong>the</strong> junior<br />

Augustus <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> imperial college, first to Gratian and after his death <strong>in</strong> August 383 to<br />

Valent<strong>in</strong>ian II until his suicide <strong>in</strong> May 392. In practice Theodosius was more powerful<br />

than <strong>the</strong> juvenile Valent<strong>in</strong>ian, but <strong>in</strong> strict <strong>the</strong>ory Theodosius rema<strong>in</strong>ed junior to<br />

Valent<strong>in</strong>ian's dynasty. He was also <strong>the</strong> first emperor s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> third century whose<br />

family was not from <strong>the</strong> Balkans. Theodosius had to assert his authority over <strong>the</strong><br />

empire twice; firstly when he was appo<strong>in</strong>ted by Gratian and aga<strong>in</strong> after <strong>the</strong> defeat of<br />

<strong>the</strong> temporarily recognised Maximus <strong>in</strong> 388. 2 Theodosius issued sixty-five laws on<br />

religious affairs throughout his reign, far more than any of his predecessors. Thirty<br />

five concerned or affected to a greater or lesser extent Christianity, <strong>the</strong> Church and<br />

clerics; 3 twenty one were directed aga<strong>in</strong>st heretics and heresies; 4 four were directed<br />

1<br />

Theod. 5.5.1-2; Aur. Vict. 47.3 on <strong>the</strong> accession. Amm. Marc. 31.13.18-19 on <strong>the</strong> losses suffered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

battle. See Williams and Friell (1994) 13-22 for details of <strong>the</strong> Gothic situation prior to Adrianople and<br />

23-35 for Theodosius' background and stabilisation post Adrianople. They provide an analysis of <strong>the</strong><br />

battle at 176-181; Mat<strong>the</strong>ws (1975) 88-100 covers <strong>the</strong> same ground with a more detailed discussion of<br />

why Theodosius was proclaimed emperor. See Err<strong>in</strong>gton (1996) who argues that Theodosius was<br />

actually recalled <strong>in</strong> 377 after a power struggle which resulted <strong>in</strong> his fa<strong>the</strong>r’s death and <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>the</strong> death<br />

or dismissal of his fa<strong>the</strong>r’s enemies. Err<strong>in</strong>gton notes that Flavius Eucherius (Eucherius 2 PLRE 1.288),<br />

<strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> murdered Theodosius was Gratian’s Com es Sacrarum Largitionum by March 377.<br />

Flavius Theodosius 3 is <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r, PLRE 1.902-904, Flavius Theodosius 4, <strong>the</strong> son PLRE 1.904-905<br />

2<br />

McLynn (1994) 109 emphasises Theodosius' <strong>in</strong>itial military dependence on Gratian and <strong>the</strong> new<br />

regime’s early practice of m<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g Gratian’s role.<br />

3<br />

CTh. 16.1.2 of 28 February 380; 16.2.25 of 28 February 380; 9.35.4 of 27 March 380; Const. Sirm. 7 of<br />

Easter 380/1; 16.2.26 of 31 March 381; 11.39.8 of 29 June 381; 9.17.6 of 30 July 381; 16.1.3 of 30 July<br />

381; 12.1.104 of 7 November 383; Const. Sirm. 3 of 4 February 384; 11.39.10 of 25 July 385/6; 16.1.4 of<br />

23 January 386; 9.17.7 of 26 February 386; Const. Sirm. 8 of 22 April 386; 12.1.115 of 31 December 386;<br />

16.4.2 of 16 June 388; 2.8.19 of 7 August 389; 9.35.5 of 6 September 389; 12.1.121 of 17 June 390; 16.2.27<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!