31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aga<strong>in</strong>st apostates; 5 n<strong>in</strong>e were on pagans or paganism; 6 four laws were concerned with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Jews 7 and two more were concerned with regulat<strong>in</strong>g Jewish-Christian personal<br />

relationships. 8 However, it should be noted that although a law may be categorised as<br />

one which affects one group, <strong>the</strong>re are a number of laws of Theodosius which actually<br />

are directed aga<strong>in</strong>st, or affect, more than one group.<br />

A number of <strong>in</strong>cidents dur<strong>in</strong>g Theodosius' reign have come to typify both <strong>the</strong><br />

power of <strong>the</strong> Church and (<strong>the</strong>refore) Christian <strong>in</strong>tolerance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> later empire: <strong>the</strong><br />

destruction of <strong>the</strong> synagogue <strong>in</strong> Call<strong>in</strong>icum <strong>in</strong> late 388 by a local bishop and his<br />

congregation, for which an order to recompense was apparently reversed because of<br />

pressure from Ambrose; 9 Theodosius' penance follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> massacre at Thessalonica<br />

<strong>in</strong> 391 10 and also <strong>the</strong> destruction of <strong>the</strong> Serapeum <strong>in</strong> Alexandria <strong>in</strong> 392. 11 Evidence<br />

from his legislation should be sought to establish whe<strong>the</strong>r such <strong>in</strong>cidents were <strong>in</strong> any<br />

way related to <strong>the</strong> fact of Theodosius be<strong>in</strong>g emperor or to some o<strong>the</strong>r factors, or none.<br />

In modern authors, Theodosius himself has a reputation as a zealous and (<strong>the</strong>refore)<br />

pious Catholic Christian, smit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> enemies of <strong>the</strong> Church, whoever <strong>the</strong>y might<br />

have been, and mak<strong>in</strong>g Catholicism <strong>the</strong> established, official religion of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Roman</strong><br />

of 21 June 390; 11.16.18 of 5 July 390; 16.2.28 of 23 August 390; 16.3.1 of 2 September 390; 12.1.123 of<br />

28 July 391; 9.40.15 of 13 March 392; 11.36.31 of 9 April 392; 2.8.20 of 17 April 392; 16.3.2 of 17 April<br />

392; 2.8.21 of 27 May 392; 9.45.1 of 18 October 392; 15.5.2 of 20 May 392/5 and 15.7.12 of 29 June 394<br />

4<br />

CTh. 16.5.6 of 10 January 381; 16.5.7 of 8 May 381; 16.5.8 of 19 July 381; 16.5.9 of 31 March 382;<br />

16.5.10 of 20 June 383; 16.5.11 of 25 June 383; 16.5.12 of 3 December 383; Coll. Av e. 2 of 383/4; 16.5.13<br />

of 21 January 384; 16.5.14 of 10 March 388; 16.5.15 of 14 June 388; 16.5.16 of 9 August 388; 16.5.17 of 4<br />

May 389; 16.5.18 of 17 June 389; 16.5.19 of 26 November 389; 16.5.20 of 19 May 391; 16.5.21 of 15 June<br />

392; 16.4.3 of 18 July 392; 16.5.22 of 15 April 394; 16.5.23 of 20 June 394 and 16.5.24 of 9 July 394.<br />

5<br />

CTh. 16.7.1 of 2 May 381; 16.7.2 of 20 May 383; 16.7.4 of 11 May 391 and 16.7.5 of 11 May 391.<br />

6<br />

CTh. 10.1.12 of 17 June 379; 16.10.7 of 21 December 381; 12.1.112 of 16 June 386; CJ 7.38.2 of 3 July<br />

387 and CTh. 16.10.12 of 8 November 392<br />

7<br />

CTh. 13.5.18 of 18 February 390; 16.10.7 of 21 December 381; 16.10.8 of 30 November 382; 16.10.9 of<br />

25 of May 385; CJ 12.1.112 of 16 June 386; 7.38.2 of 3 July 387; CTh. 16.10.10 of 24 February 391;<br />

16.10.11 of 16 June 391 and 16.10.12 of 8 November 392<br />

8<br />

CTh. 3.1.5 of 22 September 384 and 3.7.2 of 14 March 388<br />

9<br />

All <strong>the</strong> sources for <strong>the</strong> Call<strong>in</strong>icum <strong>in</strong>cident are from Ambrose’s letters: Ep. Ex. Coll. 1a; Ep. 74 and Ep.<br />

Ex. Coll. 1<br />

10 Soz. 7.25; Theod. 5.17; Amb. Ep. 51<br />

11 Soc. 5.16; Soz. 7.15; Theod. 5.22; Ruf. 11.22-30<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!