31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that Magnentius was favourable to paganism; possibly to ga<strong>in</strong> favour with <strong>the</strong> pagan<br />

establishment of Rome, or even to differentiate himself ideologically from<br />

Constant<strong>in</strong>e’s sons.<br />

The atmosphere recorded <strong>in</strong> Ammianus is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation issued at<br />

<strong>the</strong> time. While <strong>in</strong> control of Rome, Magnentius had permitted <strong>the</strong> renewal of<br />

“nocturnal sacrifices” 154 which Constantius repealed with<strong>in</strong> a few months of <strong>the</strong><br />

usurper’s death with CTh 16.10.5 of 23 November 353 to Cerealis, Prefect of Rome. 155<br />

This law referred to <strong>the</strong> “nocturnal sacrifices” as “nefarious license [which] shall be<br />

destroyed”. 156 It should be noted that this was <strong>the</strong> first use of n efas <strong>in</strong> a pagan context.<br />

Hi<strong>the</strong>rto it had only been used to describe <strong>the</strong> Jewish faith (<strong>in</strong> CTh 16.8.1 of<br />

Constant<strong>in</strong>e), so this law <strong>in</strong>dicates an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> rhetorical <strong>in</strong>vective aga<strong>in</strong>st pagans.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> this law, <strong>the</strong> allegation of n efas applies, strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g, only to <strong>the</strong><br />

licence, that is to say, <strong>the</strong> freedom of action, of Magnentius <strong>in</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g sacrifices to<br />

take place, ra<strong>the</strong>r than to <strong>the</strong> sacrifice itself. As such, Constantius appears to have been<br />

more concerned at <strong>the</strong> impudence of a usurper, and his apparent ability to re<strong>in</strong>state<br />

practices that had been forbidden, than by <strong>the</strong> return of such forbidden practices<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves. Zosimus <strong>in</strong>dicates that Magnentius was popular and was thought to have<br />

done some good dur<strong>in</strong>g his reign although this was only possible because he was so<br />

adept at hid<strong>in</strong>g his true and naturally bad character. 157 If Magnentius was <strong>in</strong>deed<br />

popular, <strong>the</strong>n Constantius may have thought it best to reserve his vitriol for<br />

Magnentius’ questionable legitimacy than for his actual, and possibly popular, policies.<br />

The addressee of CTh 16.10.5, Cerealis was quickly <strong>in</strong>stalled as Prefect of Rome<br />

by Constantius follow<strong>in</strong>g Magnentius’ flight to Gaul. Cerialis may well have been<br />

quite close and trusted by <strong>the</strong> emperor. With eight o<strong>the</strong>rs, Cerialis was commissioned<br />

154 CTh 16.10.5 sacrificia nocturna<br />

155 Naeratius Cerealis 2 PLRE I. 197-199<br />

156 nefaria de<strong>in</strong>ceps licentia repellatur<br />

157 Zos. 2.54; Sozomen 4.7, thought <strong>the</strong> opposite and blamed Magnantius for murder<strong>in</strong>g large numbers<br />

of Senators. Aurelius Victor Caes 41.23 also records that Magnentius was unpopular.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!