31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“profane holy baptism” <strong>the</strong>y were not to be given any aid “through penitence, which<br />

customarily avails <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r crimes.” 286<br />

The canons of <strong>the</strong> c306 Council of Elvira do not mention apostasy as such, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>y do <strong>in</strong>clude various offences that amounted to apostasy. The first canon ruled that<br />

a baptized Christian who sacrificed to idols was never aga<strong>in</strong> allowed to receive<br />

communion, even at <strong>the</strong> moment of death. The sense appears to be that such a<br />

Christian had thrown himself out of <strong>the</strong> church and hence was apostate. However,<br />

somewhat contradictorily, canon 59 stated that a Christian who went to observe pagan<br />

sacrifices was guilty of <strong>the</strong> same s<strong>in</strong> and was not to commune until he had completed<br />

ten years of penance. To expla<strong>in</strong> this apparent contradiction, it may have been <strong>the</strong><br />

case that perhaps <strong>the</strong>re was a tacit understand<strong>in</strong>g that observ<strong>in</strong>g such spectacles was<br />

not quite as s<strong>in</strong>ful as actively support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

If so, <strong>the</strong>n this law corresponds quite well with <strong>the</strong> attitude towards apostates as<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Elvira canons. The harshness of <strong>the</strong> first part of <strong>the</strong> law applied to those<br />

who had “polluted <strong>the</strong> faith” which is almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly a reference to sacrifice, and who<br />

could “never… return to <strong>the</strong>ir former status.” On heretics, <strong>the</strong> Elvira canons (22) ruled<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y could receive communion after ten years of penance and this is possibly<br />

paralleled <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> law’s statement that “help is extended to those persons who have gone<br />

astray.” Or equally it could be a reference to those who had deliberately witnessed<br />

pagan sacrifices, but not actively participated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

The addressee of <strong>the</strong> law, Flavianus, was, of course <strong>the</strong> famous pagan, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore it is highly unlikely that he proposed this law which appears to be directed<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st those who had deserted Christianity altoge<strong>the</strong>r, that is, become pagans. In <strong>the</strong><br />

286 Sed nec um quam <strong>in</strong> statum prist<strong>in</strong>um rev ertentur, non flagitium m orum oblitterabitur paen itentia neque<br />

um bra aliqua exquisitae defensionis aut m unim <strong>in</strong>is obducetur, quoniam quidem eos, qui fidem quam deo<br />

dicav erant polluerunt et prodentes div <strong>in</strong>um m ysterium <strong>in</strong> profana m igrarunt, tueri ea quae sunt com m enticia<br />

et conc<strong>in</strong>nata non possunt. lapsis etenim et errantibus subv enitur, perditis v ero, hoc est sanctum baptism a<br />

profanantibus, nullo rem edio paenitentiae, quae solet aliis crim <strong>in</strong>ibus prodesse succurritur.<br />

262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!