31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> same Hypatius who received CTh. 12.1.99. 298 It should be noted that Gratian’s co-<br />

emperor Theodosius had already issued two laws aga<strong>in</strong>st apostates (16.7.1 of 2 May 381<br />

and 16.7.2 of 20 May 383) before this law was issued. The fact that CTh. 16.7.2 and 3<br />

were issued with<strong>in</strong> a day of each o<strong>the</strong>r may be evidence of a co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated approach to<br />

<strong>the</strong> problem by <strong>the</strong> two governments; although <strong>the</strong> fact that both governments felt<br />

impelled to issue a law on broadly <strong>the</strong> same subject almost simultaneously is testament<br />

to <strong>the</strong> actual dissolution of <strong>the</strong> empire <strong>in</strong>to what <strong>in</strong> practice were seen as two separate<br />

halves.<br />

The law prevented apostate Christians from mak<strong>in</strong>g wills and also laid down a<br />

hierarchy, through rhetoric and through punishments, of which religious group <strong>the</strong><br />

government considered to be less unacceptable than ano<strong>the</strong>r. The law began: “By<br />

deny<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> liberty to make testaments we avenge <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al act of Christians<br />

who turn to altars and temples.” 299 The law went on to attack conversion to Judaism:<br />

“The disgraceful acts of those persons who have disda<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> dignity of <strong>the</strong> Christian<br />

religion and name and have polluted <strong>the</strong>mselves with <strong>the</strong> Jewish contagion shall be<br />

punished also.” 300 The Manichaeans came <strong>in</strong> for particular attention however and were<br />

apparently regarded as <strong>the</strong> worst of all <strong>the</strong> three groups: “But those who at any time<br />

frequent <strong>the</strong> nefarious retreats and wicked seclusion” of Manicheans were to be<br />

“pursued constantly and perpetually” by Valent<strong>in</strong>ian's CTh. 16.5.3. 301 The phrase “at<br />

any time” (aliquan do) apparently <strong>in</strong>dicates that this law was not simply directed aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

Christians who converted to Manichaeism, but was also aga<strong>in</strong>st Manichaeism <strong>in</strong><br />

general. But <strong>the</strong> law went on <strong>in</strong> a somewhat repetitious manner and dealt specifically<br />

with <strong>the</strong> “authors,” presumably <strong>the</strong> teachers of Manichaeism with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of<br />

298 Honoré’s (1998) quaestor W1 183-186<br />

299 Christianorum ad aras et tem pla m igrantium negata testandi licentia v <strong>in</strong>dicam us adm issum . “Crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />

act” be<strong>in</strong>g a fairly harsh translation of licentia.<br />

300 Eorum quoque flagitia puniantur, qui Christian ae religion is et nom <strong>in</strong>is dignitate neglecta Iudaicis sem et<br />

polluere contagiis<br />

301 Eos v ero, qui Manichaeorum nefanda secreta et scelerosos aliquando sectari m aluere secessus, ea iugiter<br />

atque perpetuo poena com itetur, quam v el div alis arbitrii genitor Valent<strong>in</strong>ianus adscripsit v el nostra n ihilo<br />

m <strong>in</strong>us saepius decreta iusserunt.<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!