31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with clubs and condemned to deportation.” 236 The law also gave particular provisions<br />

if <strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ation had occurred on an Imperial villa, or on a “villa subject to any public<br />

right” and as such it may have been issued <strong>in</strong> response to a particular problem or<br />

occurrence of heretical ord<strong>in</strong>ations. On Imperial properties <strong>the</strong>refore “<strong>the</strong> chief tenant<br />

and <strong>the</strong> procurator,” if <strong>the</strong>y had given permission for <strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ation, were to be f<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

ten pounds of gold each. 237 The f<strong>in</strong>al sentence of <strong>the</strong> law repeated <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong><br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, that is, that heretical clerics and ord<strong>in</strong>ands “who have been found to<br />

perform such mysteries” were to be f<strong>in</strong>ed ten pounds of gold each. 238<br />

The punishment of a f<strong>in</strong>e of gold was only <strong>the</strong> fourth <strong>in</strong>stance of such s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

Theodosius began his reign. It was also <strong>the</strong> first that f<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> actual offenders of <strong>the</strong><br />

law that is, those who had actively participated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> illegal activity; admittedly, CTh.<br />

9.17.6 of 30 July 381 had f<strong>in</strong>ed those who broke burial regulations by bury<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dead<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city and next to martyrs’ and sa<strong>in</strong>ts’ relics one third of <strong>the</strong>ir wealth, but had<br />

not specified that <strong>the</strong> amount should be paid <strong>in</strong> gold. That law had also levied a<br />

collective f<strong>in</strong>e on bureaucrats if <strong>the</strong>y failed to enforce <strong>the</strong> law. The practice of levy<strong>in</strong>g<br />

collective f<strong>in</strong>es (aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> gold) was repeated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> two fur<strong>the</strong>r laws (CTh. 9.40.15 of 13<br />

March 392 and CTh. 11.36.31 of 9 April 392), but only for <strong>the</strong> office staffs concerned,<br />

who had not prevented from tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>the</strong> actual offence specified <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> law.<br />

Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong>se two previous laws, and <strong>the</strong> present law, CTh. 16.5.21 were all<br />

issued to Tatianus and were all issued with<strong>in</strong> three months of each o<strong>the</strong>r. It has been<br />

noted that <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es imposed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous laws (50 pounds, 30 pounds and aga<strong>in</strong> 30<br />

pounds respectively) would probably not have been an unduly severe amount on <strong>the</strong><br />

collective resources of <strong>the</strong> bureaucrats concerned.<br />

236 quod si id possessorem , quipped clanculum gestum ignorasse constiterit, conductorem eius fundi, si <strong>in</strong>genuus<br />

est, decem libras fisco n ostro <strong>in</strong>ferred praecipim us, is derv ili faece descenden s paupertate sui poenam dam ni ac<br />

v ilitate contem nit, caesus fustibus deportation e dam nabitur.<br />

237 Tum illud specialiter praecav em us, ut, si v illa dom <strong>in</strong>ica fuerit seu cuiuslibet publici iuris et conductor et<br />

procurator licentiam deder<strong>in</strong>t colligendi, denis libris auri proposita condem nation e m ultentur.<br />

238 Verum si quos talibus repertos obsecundare m ysteriis ac sibi usurpare nom <strong>in</strong>a clericorum .<br />

244

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!