31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dur<strong>in</strong>g this latter half of 315 and January 316, Constant<strong>in</strong>e received a letter<br />

(not extant) from Celsus his vicar <strong>in</strong> Africa. 101 In his reply, as with <strong>the</strong> earlier letters<br />

preserved by Optatus, Constant<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dicated his personal <strong>in</strong>volvement by referr<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

himself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first person. Moreover he expressed his familiarity with Celsus by<br />

address<strong>in</strong>g him as frater carissim e which Constant<strong>in</strong>e only used <strong>in</strong> a very few <strong>in</strong>stances<br />

throughout his reign; 102 and also by po<strong>in</strong>tedly reflect<strong>in</strong>g and endors<strong>in</strong>g Celsus’<br />

experience with <strong>the</strong> Donatists and his op<strong>in</strong>ions of some of <strong>the</strong>m. Constant<strong>in</strong>e referred<br />

to Maenalius, a Donatist Bishop, as “long <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grip of <strong>in</strong>sanity, is obdurate, as are<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs who have departed from God’s truth and given <strong>the</strong>mselves most basely to error:<br />

so too your em<strong>in</strong>ence’s most recent letter has testified.” 103 He commended, and<br />

sympathised with, Celsus for carry<strong>in</strong>g out his “orders concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> proper handl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>the</strong>ir contumacy and had been impeded by <strong>the</strong> tumult which <strong>the</strong>y raised.” 104<br />

Constant<strong>in</strong>e referred to a hear<strong>in</strong>g he <strong>in</strong>tended to hold <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> dispute and<br />

reported that some of <strong>the</strong> Donatist bishops had sneaked back to Africa, as August<strong>in</strong>e<br />

was later to <strong>in</strong>dicate. The emperor did not actually report that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>quiry had taken<br />

place, but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> letter tends to give <strong>the</strong> impression that <strong>the</strong> unauthorised departure<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Donatists had scuppered <strong>the</strong> plans for an <strong>in</strong>quiry. Moreover, s<strong>in</strong>ce Constant<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>the</strong>n announced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> letter his <strong>in</strong>tention to come to Africa <strong>in</strong> person, it could have<br />

been <strong>the</strong> case that August<strong>in</strong>e was <strong>in</strong>correct <strong>in</strong> assum<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>quiry had already taken<br />

place <strong>in</strong> Milan.<br />

101 Domitius Celsus 8 PLRE 1 195; Barnes (1982) 146; <strong>the</strong> letter is only datable from <strong>the</strong> known duration<br />

of Celsus’ vicariate. Corcoran (2000) 306 dates it to “late 315”; Maier (1987) 194 to Autumn 315<br />

102 Opt. App. 7; Ziwsa 211-212; Edwards 193-194; Corcoran (2000) 22 n80, 168, 239 n30, 306, 322, 323,<br />

330; Corcoran (2000) 335-336 only lists ano<strong>the</strong>r eleven <strong>in</strong>stances of this use throughout <strong>the</strong> period with<br />

which he deals, i.e. up to 324.<br />

103 Opt. App. 7; Ziwsa 211 Edwards 193: persev erare Menalium eum , quem iam dudum susceperat <strong>in</strong>san ia,<br />

ceteros, qui a v eritate dei digressi errori se prauissim o dederuntproxim a etiam grav itatis tuae scripta testata<br />

sunt<br />

104 Opt. App. 7; Ziwsa 211; Edwards 193: quibus <strong>in</strong>haerentem te iussion i nostrae de m erito seditionis<br />

ipsorum eoque tum ultu, quem apparabant, <strong>in</strong>hibitum esse m em orasti.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!