31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Modestus returned <strong>the</strong> next day to execute <strong>the</strong> Nicenes, but realised it would be<br />

counter productive when his unit was overtaken by a Nicene woman desperate to<br />

achieve martyrdom for herself and her child. Modestus returned to Valens and<br />

persuaded him that <strong>the</strong> order should not be carried out. Modestus is also given credit<br />

for secretly warn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Nicenes of Edessa to avoid <strong>the</strong> church <strong>in</strong> order to save <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

lives. Like Ammianus, <strong>the</strong> ecclesiastical historians <strong>in</strong>dicate that Modestus was able to<br />

persuade Valens from a course of action. 227<br />

Although at <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>the</strong> historians also accuse him of execut<strong>in</strong>g up to<br />

eighty Nicene clerics <strong>in</strong> 370 on Valens’ orders, by means of a burn<strong>in</strong>g boat <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gulf<br />

of Astacus. Ostensibly <strong>the</strong>y were put on <strong>the</strong> boat <strong>in</strong> order to go <strong>in</strong>to exile, but <strong>in</strong><br />

reality, so <strong>the</strong> ecclesiastical historians argue, Modestus was afraid of <strong>the</strong> popular<br />

reaction to <strong>the</strong>ir execution so <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>cident was designed to look like an<br />

accident. 228 Lenski doubts whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> accounts that <strong>the</strong> clerics were deliberately<br />

burnt are accurate, he admits that it is impossible to discern whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re ever was a<br />

plot, but believes it unlikely. He argues that such a plot would have done Valens no<br />

good and <strong>in</strong> addition it may be argued that arrang<strong>in</strong>g such a plot would have been a<br />

long and difficult process dur<strong>in</strong>g which time Valens’ wrath may have abated anyway. 229<br />

Modestus’ personal religion is difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e; he may well have been an<br />

ancient equivalent of <strong>the</strong> ‘vicar of Bray’. Libanius wrote to him when he was com es of<br />

<strong>the</strong> east <strong>in</strong> mid 360 urg<strong>in</strong>g him to complete a portico attached to <strong>the</strong> temple of<br />

Dionysius <strong>in</strong> Antioch <strong>in</strong> such a way as not to upset those who were liable to perform<br />

such liturgies. As such he may well have been a pagan under Constantius, or at least<br />

sympa<strong>the</strong>tic to paganism. However, Libanius’ letter gives no h<strong>in</strong>t that he and<br />

Modestus may share <strong>the</strong> same religion, and <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>the</strong> portico may not have been a<br />

226 Lenski (2002) 63-64<br />

227 Soc. 4.18, Soz. 6.18, Ruf. 11.5, Theod. 4.17; Lenski (2002) 257-258<br />

228 Soc. 4.16, Soz. 6.14<br />

229 Lenski (2002) 250-251<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!