31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

monasteries had been established <strong>in</strong> Constant<strong>in</strong>ople dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reign of Constantius<br />

II. 137 At <strong>the</strong> same time, and <strong>in</strong> his defence, and with his customary cunn<strong>in</strong>g, Tatianus<br />

could quite plausibly have claimed that this law was merely regulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> behaviour<br />

of monks to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y rema<strong>in</strong>ed attached to <strong>the</strong>ir ascetic ideal. 138 A view even<br />

expressed by John Chrysostom who was concerned at monks be<strong>in</strong>g mistaken for<br />

vagrants through <strong>the</strong>ir common practice of begg<strong>in</strong>g. 139 Sozomen also records that John<br />

Chrysostom tried to keep his monks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> monastery <strong>in</strong> Constant<strong>in</strong>ople, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

wander<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> city. 140<br />

However <strong>the</strong> law was viewed as controversial, and was repealed n<strong>in</strong>eteen<br />

months later by CTh. 16.3.2. of 17 April 392. 141 However, <strong>the</strong> demand for repeal<br />

probably did not come from <strong>the</strong> orthodox Church establishment as may be evidenced<br />

by <strong>the</strong> concerns of Chrysostom noted above. Ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> repeal was more likely to<br />

have come from <strong>the</strong> Christian secular elite and from <strong>the</strong>ir new fashion to cultivate<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own ‘personal’ ascetics. Victor and Saturn<strong>in</strong>us, officials <strong>in</strong> Valens’ government,<br />

competed with each o<strong>the</strong>r by build<strong>in</strong>g hermitages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grounds of <strong>the</strong>ir houses <strong>in</strong><br />

order to attract Isaac, <strong>the</strong> prom<strong>in</strong>ent Syrian monk of Constant<strong>in</strong>ople; Saturn<strong>in</strong>us won<br />

<strong>the</strong> contest. 142 Admiration for ascetic ideals extended <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> heart of <strong>the</strong> Imperial<br />

court and even family; Arsenius, tutor to Theodosius' two sons left his prestigious<br />

position <strong>in</strong> 394 to become a monk <strong>in</strong> Egypt, where, despite his comprehensive<br />

137<br />

Soz. 4.2.3<br />

138<br />

Caner suggests (199-200) that <strong>the</strong> banishment of monks from cities was <strong>in</strong> some way associated with<br />

Theodosius' earlier legislation prevent<strong>in</strong>g clerics or <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>in</strong> general from <strong>in</strong>herit<strong>in</strong>g anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from widows (CTh. 16.2.27). S<strong>in</strong>ce that law was repealed (by 16.2.28) possibly Tatianus was hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r attack on legacy hunt<strong>in</strong>g clerics by simply attempt<strong>in</strong>g to prevent contact between one type of<br />

cleric and elderly widows. If so, <strong>the</strong> law would appear to be particularly clumsy as monks could still<br />

cultivate wealthy widows <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> countryside, where <strong>the</strong>re may well have been more of <strong>the</strong>m (resident<br />

on <strong>the</strong>ir estates) than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> towns. See Whittaker and Garnsey (1998) 301-304 for elites spend<strong>in</strong>g time<br />

on <strong>the</strong>ir estates.<br />

139<br />

John Chrysostom In I Thess IV hom 6.1; <strong>in</strong> Caner (2002) 171<br />

140<br />

Soz 8.9.4<br />

141<br />

Honoré (1998) 73 attributes this law to his E11, <strong>the</strong> last quaestor of Theodosius' reign.<br />

142 V. Isaacii 4.16 <strong>in</strong> Caner (2002) 192<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!