31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is naturally disposed to be truthful <strong>in</strong> all th<strong>in</strong>gs.” 139 In 361 Julian received a Senatorial<br />

embassy led by Symmachus and Maximus. Julian appo<strong>in</strong>ted Maximus as Urban<br />

Prefect over <strong>the</strong> “better man”, i.e. over Symmachus only <strong>in</strong> deference to Maximus’<br />

uncle, Ruf<strong>in</strong>us Vulcatius. 140 Ammianus tells us that Valent<strong>in</strong>ian “hated <strong>the</strong> well-<br />

dressed, <strong>the</strong> learned, <strong>the</strong> rich and <strong>the</strong> high-born”. 141 We do not know whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Symmachus was “well-dressed”, but Libanius thought him to be “learned” and he was<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly “rich and high-born.” 142 The opportunity to deliver a law to Rome and to a<br />

member of a group to whom Valent<strong>in</strong>ian was not naturally favourable and who had<br />

been on close personal relations with <strong>the</strong> former regime, and who <strong>the</strong>refore may have<br />

been viewed as close to <strong>the</strong> usurper, should be sufficient to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> unique severity<br />

of this law dur<strong>in</strong>g this moment of crisis for <strong>the</strong> fledgl<strong>in</strong>g regime.<br />

Valent<strong>in</strong>ian and Judaism<br />

CTh 7.8.2 is Valent<strong>in</strong>ian's only surviv<strong>in</strong>g law on Judaism and ordered<br />

Remigius, <strong>the</strong> Magister Officiorum of <strong>the</strong> West 143 not to use Synagogues for quarter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

his troops; <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>the</strong> “homes of private citizens, not religious <strong>in</strong>stitutions” should be<br />

used. 144 This law did not make a special case for Judaism, but ra<strong>the</strong>r implied that<br />

Judaism should be treated as all o<strong>the</strong>r religions s<strong>in</strong>ce all religion um loca were also<br />

granted this privilege.<br />

138<br />

Soc. 3.13; but c/f Soc. 4.1 where Julian opted to reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir services although <strong>the</strong>y had refused to<br />

sacrifice. Soz.6.6 <strong>in</strong>dicates that Valent<strong>in</strong>ian was exiled for his faith under Julian, though ostensibly on<br />

<strong>the</strong> grounds of military <strong>in</strong>competence.<br />

139<br />

Jul. Ep. 50 (Loeb); 82 (Bude): tou` kalou` Summavcon punqavnou. pevpeismai<br />

gavr, o]ti u[potj a{vn ejkwvn ei`nai yeuvsaito.<br />

140<br />

Amm. Marc. 21.12.24; Maximus 17 PLRE Vol 1 582; et potiore posthabito<br />

141<br />

Amm. Marc. 30.8.10: bene v estitos oderat et eruditos et opulentos et n obiles<br />

142<br />

Lib. Ep. 177.4 <strong>in</strong> Loeb; given as 1004 <strong>in</strong> Foerster<br />

143<br />

Remigius PLRE Vol 1 763<br />

144<br />

L<strong>in</strong>der (1987) 161-163: In synagogam Iudaeicae legis hospitii v elut nerito <strong>in</strong>ruentes iubeas em igrare, quos<br />

priv atorum dom us, non religionum loca habitationum m erito conv enit adt<strong>in</strong> ere<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!